203
On your mark, get set...
(i.imgur.com)
edit: to clarify, I don’t agree with any of this, I just thought it was funny.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
203 points (100.0% liked)
People Twitter
10288 readers
1030 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
- If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
For even a medium-sized orchestra I think a conductor is required. In the end you need one person who decides the tempo and timings. Without a conductor a musician will have to play the part. Here's an example: https://youtu.be/oJ2ZLr87lLY
Clearly the main violinist takes over the role of conductor, but even then timings are off even in this short piece. And that's a trained orchestra with a well-known piece. A full symphony with a larger orchestra and maybe even a choir (like Beethoven's 9th) would sound terrible without a good conductor.
You 100% need a conductor.
Light travels a lot faster than sound.
So even if everyone focused on a single musician they'd all slip out of time.