343
submitted 10 months ago by sanqueue@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 38 points 10 months ago

Personally I think all medicine should be public domain

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 17 points 10 months ago

Everything should.

Medicine. Internet. Waste disposal.

[-] datendefekt@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

All utilities, phone, electricity, sewage, road and rail.

But actually looking at these, pretty much all protocols and standards are already open.

[-] Fredthefishlord 4 points 10 months ago

So you want to reduce innovation and cause creators to not get properly paid for their work? Great idea

[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

No, because paying for your medicin and Internet is something your government/country SHOULD do.

Healthy people with access to the surrounding world through the Internet is a giant net positive for a country.

But ofc we have to think of the poor billionaires first.

[-] Fredthefishlord 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Healthy people with access to the surrounding world through the Internet is a giant net positive for a country

Certainly, if that was all the public domain was, it'd be great! But it's much worse than that. It allows people to freely take and profit off the art of others without paying dividends. It allows larger companies to steal and copy designs of small, new companies and under cut them even more readily and easily than they already do.

There's plenty of downsides that you're not considering.

[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I don't know if you commented on the wrong thing, but I argued that medicin and Internet (and similar) should be paid by the country (taxes).

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 8 points 10 months ago

lol "innovation" what is this 1925?

how innovative are the cars being produced because they look the same.

half those medicines are publicly funded

the Internet is publicly funded.

this belief of private sector innovation is not as true as they sell it to be.

[-] Fredthefishlord 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

So you're just going to ignore the even worse creative theft that would happen under such laws towards artistic talents.

There'd be much less in the way of tv shows or animations.

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 1 points 10 months ago

why do you think that??

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
343 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59276 readers
3926 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS