757
submitted 10 months ago by TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

CommonDreams.org

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

Wow is Israel the new Nazi state?

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Has been for decades.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Israel did Lebensraum in 1949, so they've been a Nazi state since about that long ago.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago
[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yes this isn't old news to be either. What's the point of redirecting?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

To explain how Israel is not a new Nazi state.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago

Metula is a town of 1700 people. Probably not safe to assume that every random Israeli dildo that says something idiotic is speaking for the country.

[-] machinin@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

The key will be if anything happens to that person as a result. Will there be any repercussions for him? If not, it is likely a systematic issue in their culture.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

It reminds me of the whole "If you let a Nazi stay in your bar, it will eventually become a Nazi bar" allegory.

Israel seems to already have become a Nazi bar, for quite a while even.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

What would happen? Israelis have freedom of expression and it's unlikely his disgusting comments rise to the level of a crime. Would you call that an actionable threat? He's about as close to decision-makers as we are. Like, when Lindsey Graham called this conflict a holy war against Islam, it was revolting but I doubt most were surprised that he wasn't legally punished. The most likely punishment is public ridicule and revulsion because there are few cases where people face legal consequences for speech.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

The most likely punishment is public ridicule and revulsion because there are few cases where people face legal consequences for speech.

Yeah, and something tells me he isn't gonna get these things.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

What tells you? Do you think the Auschwitz Museum isn't well-respected in Israel? Most English-language coverage in Israel seems to at least be prominently featuring the criticism over his statement.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

It's because at least 50% of Israelis agree with him. That's the number of right wing voters.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

Which party ran on a platform of murdering or displacing everyone in Gaza? Most Israeli voters vehemently disagree with parties that ran on considerably less extreme platforms than that. Half the reason for the emergency unity government was removing those less extreme extremists from decision-making positions.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

I mean right-wing parties generally run on not allowing a Palestinian state to be created, and on settlement of the West bank and "hard on Gaza" policies. They're not explicitly running on genociding Gaza, but that's what these things mean.

I can't find a recent poll about Israeli approval of the war (the most recent one I found was made in 19 November and had 88% approval), but the idea that Israelis are being forced to take part in this against their will is decidedly false; otherwise

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

Then why the move to pull the crazies out of cabinet? If what you're saying is true, there isn't a possible world where the public wouldn't want the crazies in there to carry out the genocide they've been covertly voting for. Why would the public support Benny Gantz, a moderate on Palestine, coming into cabinet? Why would he be so far ahead in election polling?

People saying that they support a war with Hamas is very different from saying they support the murder or displacement of all the residents of Gaza.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

I see. I guess that does give me slightly more hope for the future.

[-] flathead@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Military service is more-or-less mandatory in Israel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_Israel

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

What does "representative democracy" even mean amirite fellas

[-] machinin@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

A repercussion could also include him being removed from office if his constituents feel strongly about it. You use the example of Lindsay Graham. If America didn't have such deep systemic racist issues, a violent military-centric culture, or a strong Christo-fascist element in society, he would probably be recalled. As it is, genocide Joe, our government and much of the population seem perfectly fine with eliminating the Palestinians. Recently there has been stronger push-back. That is nice to see, but we still have a long way to do before we can develop a good cultural response against genocide.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

I don't have any problem with there being consequences for his statement. I don't even know what options his constituents have to remove him, to be honest. I just don't think there's only one conclusion to be drawn from him not being punished. Notably in the case of Graham, you talk about his constituents. For Azoulai it's his culture. His constituents are 1700 people.

Do you think that all Americans support a holy war against Islam because Graham wasn't punished? Presumably not. Why do you ascribe the belief to all Israelis here?

[-] machinin@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I'm not saying all Americans support this unholy war, but not enough are outraged that I think it is a sign of deep cultural problems in our society. Trump is the chief symptom of our insanity. Israel is also a sick society, and that person saying those abhorrent things without any negative impact on his life is a symptom.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Speaking of systemic cultural issues.

Seventy-two percent of respondents said they believed the Hamas decision to launch the cross-border rampage in southern Israel was "correct" given its outcome so far, while 22% said it was "incorrect". The remainder were undecided or gave no answer.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/poll-shows-palestinians-back-oct-7-attack-israel-support-hamas-rises-2023-12-14/

[-] machinin@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah, definitely, the Palestinians are suffering immensely and have never had a means of finding justice for the harms they have suffered. I wrote this in another comment, but if the Israelis ever decide to pursue a path of healing instead of genocide, it is going to take a long time for the Palestinians to heal and recover from those harms.

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago
[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago
[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Which of the sources do you have a problem with?

[-] flathead@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

JFC the article is practically just a list of referenced sources - congrats on your block.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'd wager the vast majority of people in the IDF have similar sentiments.

Most of them are racist, sexist, right-wing scumbags.

this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
757 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2042 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS