1262

While they were happy with what the fairphone 4 brought to the table, they seem to like what was changed for the fairphone 5.
What are you guys' opinions on this? A welcome change? would you get one if your phone died within the next year?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 119 points 2 years ago

And I give it a 0/10 on having a 3.5mm connector

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 46 points 2 years ago

Is that really that much of an issue in the age of USB-C?

[-] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 85 points 2 years ago

Yes, the 3.5mm jack is more durable than USB-C (since it is rotationally symmetric twisting doesn't apply force to the connector), it maintains compatibility with billions of audio devices and doesn't block your charging port if you use it.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

Begs the question why aren't charging jacks designed like audio jacks?

[-] turmacar@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If you wanted them just for charging it would be fine. Barrel jacks are still pretty ubiquitous.

If you want them to also be data they get less great. They make 3.5mm/etc jacks with 3 "pins" and I assume more. But every time you're inserting/removing the cable it's rubbing past the insulators separating the contacts. Their failure per plug/unplug is higher than something like USB-C where the 24 contacts are being pushed together instead of brushing past each other. It would suck if you put in your USB-barrel and one of the contacts broke/bent.

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago

It's actually a bit crazy - and very impressive - that the cable I use to tickle-charge my phone at 15W could also be used to connect four 4K screens, an external GPU, multiple 10GBe network adapters all while providing well over 200W of power... if my phone supported and of that, that is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

There are plenty of products out there that use TS style audio plugs (more 2.5mm in my experience than 3.5mm) for DC power for portable devices. When you get to data transfer requirements, the higher pin counts of current connectors wouldn't be space efficient.

[-] firefly@neon.nightbulb.net 8 points 2 years ago

They could just make magnetic connectors with a shallow socket. But those would last longer and you wouldn't need to keep buying new stuff.

CC: @Petter1@lemm.ee

[-] ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I love the CC. Makes this conversation feel more formal.

[-] firefly@neon.nightbulb.net 6 points 2 years ago

Yes, it does impart a sense of gravity to otherwise mundane chatter. The only thing missing is letterhead with a monogram.

For some reason I don't yet understand, my fediverse server inserts the CC in some replies and I forgot to catch it. I haven't had time to analyze the rooster's guts yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Luccus@feddit.de 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't get why you get so much downvotes, because it's not as obvious as people make it out to be and there are plenty of adapters. So it's a good question.

But yes. The 3.5mm jack had the thing companies say they are striving for: simplicity.

DACs are nice and everything but the phone can just decide to not connect properly. The DAC can decide it had enough of your phone. In either case you'd need to reconnect them. And that means unlocking your phone, because a secure phone will block streaming to 'unknown' USB-C devices, unless it's unlocked during the negotiation phase. And if your connectors have become wonky for whatever reason: Well, no music for you.

And then there's the issue where you have to have them at hand when you need them. In your car, on your person, while at work.

3.5mm is great because it actually "just works". One of the few things that can claim such thing.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Lazz45@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 years ago

Yes, I should be able to play music, AND charge the phone without a 9 wire adapter like those universal charger plugs from 10 years ago. Wild concept. I wonder when phone tech will be able to support such a thing

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

I think phones should have 2 USB-C ports

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wazzupdog@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Live by the wire, die by the wire(with a 3.5mm plug/jack of course)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vardogor@mander.xyz 8 points 2 years ago

my issue right now is that i use one of those charging + 3.5mm splitters in the car, but when they're both connected there's a loud ass buzz. a 3.5mm ground loop isolator works but made bass sound terrible. i'm probably gonna get an old phone just for music in the car 🤦🏽‍♂️

[-] jasondj@ttrpg.network 4 points 2 years ago

Just get a new car pleb.

Honestly Bluetooth in a car has been a must for me for like 10 years now. And having experienced CarPlay, that’s def next (especially for cars that support wireless and have a Qi spot. Thats practically magic)

[-] vardogor@mander.xyz 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

i like my car :( and i'm paranoid about features in new cars. i can hear a noticeable difference in quality with bluetooth vs wired too. never been a fan

regardless, cars that people primarily use 3.5mm for aren't going away too soon!

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dynamo@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As well as a 5.25" floppy disc drive and betamax, you call that a phone?!? No thank you, I'll stick with my x-phone https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9-nezImUP0w

People complaining about 3.5mm jacks remind of the people who complained about how the iMac G3 didn't have a 3.5" floppy drive. At first yeah it was weird to leave it out, but it's been 9 years since the first smartphone launched without a 3.5mm jack (the OPPO R5 in 2014).

If you want ancient tech then your options will be limited.

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago

Ancient tech? Looks at literally every laptop and desktop sold.

Headphone jack removal is anti-consumer and any device without one is missing a key component. Why would I buy a device missing a key component?

Plus you can find wired headphones EVERYWHERE. Walk into any gas station and pick up replacements for $10. Sure they may not be the best quality, but they work. Also, no charging, just plug them into your device. Also, no setup, just plug it in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SitD@feddit.de 32 points 2 years ago

i actually find this argument flawed. Bluetooth is great but does not provide feature parity. correct me if I'm wrong but aptX was supposed to be lossless audio, but it has been shown that it has compression artifacts. I'll be happy with Bluetooth only if we can have absolutely lossless audio

[-] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 6 points 2 years ago

If you can tell the difference between well-compressed, high bitrate audio and lossless audio played on the same equipment, then you’re in the minority. However it’s pretty easy to accidentally end up with a combo of phone / app / app settings / headphones that results in a suboptimal listening experience, either because you’re using a bad codec (like SBC on any device or AAC on many Android phones) or because your music is being compressed twice. You can avoid the latter issue by streaming uncompressed music or by using a combo that doesn’t recompress your music (like Apple Music -> iPhone -> Airpods Pro/Max).

It’s also possible that the reason Bluetooth headphones sound worse isn’t because of losing information but because the headphones just aren’t as good as your wired ones. If you get a portable Bluetooth DAC like the Qudelix 5k, you can connect it to your phone and connect your wired headphones to it.

You don’t have to be happy with Bluetooth. You can buy a USB-C DAC for like $10. Apple’s “USB C to 3.5mm Headphone Jack Adapter” is 9 USD direct from Apple and it tested extremely well. You can use it on any modern phone or on your laptop or tablet, too. (You can also use the Qudelix 5k this way.)

If that adapter isn’t good enough (maybe it doesn’t output enough power for your high impedance headphones), then most phone’s built-in DACs + headphone adapters would have the same problem. Basically only Sony and LG (RIP) phones ever had especially good onboard DACs and amps, and even with them it would often make more sense to get a dedicated portable setup.

For anyone who is happy with Bluetooth, though, they don’t have to worry about all this and they get to reap the advantages of the headphone jack’s removal. The extra space can be used for more battery, if nothing else, and it’s easier to prevent dust/water ingress when you eliminate the headphone jack.

Also, I think you’re thinking of LDAC (by Sony), not aptX (by Qualcomm). LDAC is not lossless, either, but it’s much higher bitrate than anything other than the very recently introduced aptX Lossless, which - under ideal conditions - features lossless compression.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

So, the smaller version of the connector that studios use to this day is ancient, huh?

[-] crsu@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

pfft musicians what the hell do they know about music

NOTHING

[-] ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

My electrician says that woodworking doesn't need ancient tools like hammers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

This is not a well thought out response.

The things you mention had workable replacements and/or were the loser in a standards war. Bluetooth headphones have weaker audio, battery limitations on the headphones and the streaming device and the argument for removing them is just not justified outside of forced path to profits for proprietary headphone sales. Also, there are USB-c headphone options and problems are two fold - clunky, costly adapters and increased stress on the phone's main charging port.

It's not even close to ancient and you're argument is extremely weak.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Arthur_Leywin@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Ethernet must be ancient tech to you.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The difference here is that 3,5mm jacks are not obsolete.

Nobody besides a few grumpy folks opposed the switch from microUSB to Type-C, for example, because we got something better instead.

Floppy drives got obsolete, because again, we got something better - disks! And then flash drives! Always a better, more convenient and functional option.

3,5 mm jack, however, is still completely relevant and is not replaced by anything. It is the only widely adopted consumer-grade standard for analog wired audio. Wireless audio has objective drawbacks: one more battery to control, lower reliability, poorer sound quality (not a big issue with most phones since their DACs are normally not audiophile-grade anyway, but still), higher price, pairing issues, and many more. And USB-C to 3,5mm dongles are obviously terrible: they can get lost, they don't allow you to listen to music while charging your phone/transferring files, and they are yet another component to manage.

Essentially, wireless audio has been pushed down our throats, and we do not appreciate that. For me, not having a 3,5mm jack is one of the criterions that immediately kill any desire to buy that phone. It will just be a massive pain in the ass for me, and I don't want that.

[-] Melco@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

you do know that you could have made your point in a nicer manner, yes? why would we want to bring the strenuous tones of hollow outrage from reddit to here?

we are all better than that, even the big danish guys.

[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

I'm sorry, but I had to say something. I'm so tired of non-technical people moaning about the out phasing of the 3.5mm jack, and especially the arguments about audio quality and vendor lock in that has been raised in this thread. I had to make sure that it was understood, that the view is not unopposed.

Could I have done it more diplomatically? Maybe, but I also wanted to drive my point home in as short a post as possible.

I asked chatgpt to help out rewriting my comment, but with your criticism in mind. It came up with:

While 3.5mm jacks may seem like a staple, it's worth noting that technology evolves. Much like the transition from 3.5" floppy drives, change takes time to be widely accepted. The omission of the jack in smartphones isn't about dismissing tradition but adapting to newer, more versatile alternatives. It's been nearly a decade since the OPPO R5, and as technology progresses, embracing these changes can lead to a broader range of innovative features.

I don't want to bore people to death, but I can also see now how perhaps I could have attacked the technology instead of the people.

We are better than our old /u/ on reddit, and we must strive to keep it that way. Competing with reddit on toxicity, will be a fight we'll never be able to win.

Thank you for calling me out on my BS, and helping us all to keep the fediverse a better place.

[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 13 points 2 years ago

Being an electronic engineer and a programmer I would categorize myself as a "technical person". I am also a person that prefers devices that are as reliable an repairable as possible. A headphone without a battery and with a replaceable cable can last you literally decades. A TWS one, will not.

To add to that, using a dongle means a separate device that can break (and is most likely not repairable), that isn't necessarily compatible with anything you plug it in to, that has a dac (which is redundant since your phone could use the internal one if you had a 3.5mm connector) and that will cause extra battery drain (regardless of how much more, it's more than 0).

There are literally 0 benefits to removing the headphone jack. Several people have even shown that devices that "don't have enough space" for it can be modded to add the 3.5mm jack and you don't even lose any functionality.

Removing the headphone jack is a step backwards.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] crsu@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

This is just proof smartphones are toys and not real tools.

They do everything poorly. iPhone video and photo looks like garbage compared to a real camera and now you can't even play music without overly compressed bluetooth. This is like wanting a flip phone filter for your camera. It's asinine and backward and you defend it like a lemming because HURR FLOPPY DISK SMALL. Apples and oranges. A universal connector capable of delivering a strong signal is not the same as a low capacity storage format.

But please do go on about how great your tracking device is

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ronflex@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Get over it, gramps 🤣

There is an adapter, buttt yeah I would really miss being able to just plug in a pair of headphones.

[-] dog_@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

That is a solution to a problem nobody wanted.

[-] Pazuzu@midwest.social 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If they gave us a second usb-c port instead I wouldn't complain so much. So dumb that I have to choose between charging and audio

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1262 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73416 readers
4147 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS