400
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

1.8 Million Barrels of Oil a Day Avoided from Electric Vehicles::Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News! We love covering electric ... [continued]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WidowsFavoriteSon@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Let's be straight about this: It ain't electric cars. Its e-bikes

[-] Metype@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago

I'll take a bike over a car any day, but for people who were going to drive? An electric vehicle will save oil usage over an ICE one.

[-] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

Well, it's both. From the article, 2-3 wheelers do account for 60% of the drop:

[-] aeharding@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Oh this is so fucking typical. “EV” or electric vehicles never means e-bikes when it would benefit e-bikes (for example, EV subsidies = electric car subsidies) but when it conveniently makes electric cars look better, oh look an e-bike is an EV! 😒

[-] HaoBianTai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

Isn't this article very clearly referring to Asian adoption of scooters, not a bunch of New Yorkers on e-bikes?

[-] adrian783@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

does that invalidate the point?

[-] HaoBianTai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I mean, yes? You're whining about US decision making around subsidies using a portion of the article discussing electric scooters in places like Taiwan. These are different continents and different vehicle types.

A $500 subsidy on electric bicycles would not get Americans out of their cars and onto a bicycle, but it might make cyclists move to electric bikes, which wouldn't be a behavioral change that would impact anything relevant to this study.

I'm on your side, I wish my commute was only a couple miles. I'd ride a bicycle, and I've considered electric motorcycles. But you're barking up the wrong tree, "price" is not what's keeping Americans off of bicycles, electric or otherwise.

[-] adrian783@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A $500 subsidy on electric bicycles would not get Americans out of their cars and onto a bicycle, but it might make cyclists move to electric bikes, which wouldn't be a behavioral change that would impact anything relevant to this study.

why would you think that? I think you're wrong and price is a big factor. cyclists are unlikely to move to ebike because they can already make it work on a regular bike.

[-] poopkins@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Strange that the parent comment is downvoted for highlighting the fact that electric bikes (and scooters & trikes) continue to make more of an impact.

For me personally, since I got my electric bike 2 years ago, I use it at least 90% of the time to commute to work (unless the weather is too miserable).

[-] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

If I may ask, what bike did you get, and what are the stats for range and speed?

[-] poopkins@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Oh I'd have to check about the stats. I'm in Switzerland, where I use a Winora Tria 8 and usually carry along just above the electrical assistance (unless I go up a mountain), which caps out at 25 km/h.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 7 points 2 years ago

I go to work 50/50 by electric car or analog bike. Most of those barrels saved it's me

[-] Gregorech@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Still a vehicle in a pure sense.

[-] jumpinjesus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah which is always weird. How many of those people weren't just riding normal bikes before vs downsizing from a car. I'm on my 3rd EV and would love to bike if it were an option where I live, but if I went with a bike, I'd just be replacing another EV.

[-] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Assuming you could feasibly bike, it would probably still be environmentally better to use the bike, mostly because it is more energy efficient at moving a single human places because it doesn't have to move a whole car frame, and in most places a fair amount of power is still from fossil fuels, so less would be needed. Also the other benefits of biking.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
400 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

87325 readers
3189 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS