749
submitted 9 months ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 62 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As she was about to enter the machine, the gun was attracted to the powerful magnet inside it and fired off a single round into and through her right buttock. Luckily, the bullet barely penetrated her skin and the doctor on site described her entry and exit wounds as “very small and superficial.”

There is no way the MRI wasn't damaged. Other hospital go'ers will be footing that bill. She should be garneshed wages for the rest of her life until those repairs are paid.

"Lucky" would be the bullet being lodged in her body, doing no further damage except to her idiot self so she would learn her lesson without impacting others.

[-] EnmaAi22@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

Having her money taken for the rest of her life is not a good response. Ofcourse she's a fucking dumbass, but having her life destroyed because of that one moment is not adequate.

The problem of healthcare in the USA is way more severe than a destroyed MRI machine.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

"Garnished" means to take an amount small enough not to diminish her means of survival. She just wouldn't have her luxuries.

Even in single payer systems, dumbasses should be fined for damages.

[-] HotChickenFeet@sopuli.xyz 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

FWIW, in the US, seems like you're 'guaranteed' that you'll keep 30 hours worth of minimum wage per week. the minimum wage is abysmal, so ~870 a month, which isn't really enough to survive on in many places. I suspect it would be terribly difficult to pay rent, gas/electric, buy food, pay for public transport and/or gas.

I think this person was dumb. I think they fucked up badly. I think garnishment could make sense if the terms were more reasonable. But I think the current terms could absolutely be detrimental to ones survival.

Title III also protects individuals by limiting the amount of earnings that may be garnished in any workweek or pay period to the lesser of 25 percent of disposable earnings or the amount by which disposable earnings are greater than 30 times the Federal minimum hourly wage prescribed by Section 6(a) (1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. This limit applies regardless of how many garnishment orders an employer receives. The Federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour. Source

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
749 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

11863 readers
309 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS