907
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 147 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mercator Projection. So many ways to try to represent a sphere on a flat 2D plane but none are perfect

https://theconversation.com/five-maps-that-will-change-how-you-see-the-world-74967

And this “True Size” map is fun to play with.

TheTrueSize

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago
[-] grue@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

What Your Favorite Map Projection Says About You

Dymaxian

You like Isaac Asimov, XML, and shoes with toes. You think the Segway got a bad rap. You own 3D goggles, which you use to view rotating models of better 3D goggles. You type in Dvorak.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago

That can't be right. Nobody likes XML.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

XML is fine when used in spaces it suits, though JSON is generally better

[-] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ooh so this sent me down a Wikipedia rabbit hole and it's so fun! I'm deciding my favorite between:

  • Strebe 1995
  • Robinson
  • Goode homolosine
  • Waterman Butterfly

They seem intuitive without much if any distortion. Really cool stuff!

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

almost: i moved past toe shoes to just going barefoot a year ago, i have no 3D goggles nor a VR headset, and i use colemak

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Funnily enough, I typed in Dvorak for years before I ever selected Dymaxion on that comic, but I have never viewed VR goggles in VR (my first 3d goggles were in the Pentium-1-with-small-hundreds-of-MHz-of-clock era)

I needed a Trinitron monitor to get 60hz refresh in each eye

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Hey, dvorak is cool

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Psh, I haven't used Dvorak for a decade now

[-] ericbomb@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

What Greenland actually looks like is always wild.

It looks like this massive arrow head that stretches so far to the east and west as you go north...

When really it's just like a normal island.

[-] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

And japans larger than it seems too when compared to the eastern US.

Or the sheer size of the African continent

[-] onlyhalfminotaur@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Still pretty big though, about the same north-south as the u.s.

[-] ericbomb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I mean it is a big island.

But on the standard map it looks like it's as big as Mexico, Canada, and USA combined.

When really it's only about 30% larger than Alaska by square km.

You undersell Alaskas sheer square milage, it is a chunky boy

[-] ericbomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Alaska is 1.7 m sq km and greenland is 2.2 m sq km. So I don't think I'm too far off.

So greenland is a bit bigger, when it's crazy on the map they don't look at all to be on the same scale.

It's even crazier for Mexico. Mexico is only a little bit smaller, but on the map it looks abysmally small in comparison.

My point is Alaska is 1/5 of the USA's landmass. Calling Greenland a big island is underselling. If it were on its own in the Atlantic or pacific we'd argue over if it count as a dwarf continent

[-] ericbomb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying it's not a massive island.

But just on standard maps it looks like it's the size of Mexico, Canada, and US put together.

When it's just a bit bigger than Mexico.

[-] pc486@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

It's a bummer this article pushes aside the importance of calculating bearings. Figuring bearings remains a required skill in both sea and air navigation. GPS works very well, but you don't want to depend entirely upon it when there's life and property at risk. Sextants, chronographs, and navigational maps remain onboard many ships.

To not be so negative, here's something interesting the article does raise but didn't mention: azimuthal maps are regularly projected at any place on earth. Azimithual projected at a radio station this makes pointing directional antennas intuitive and fast. It's also helpful in grasping how a directional antenna will behave as their radiation patterns are drawn in polar coordinates and hence can be drawn on top of an azimithual map.

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's possible to project a sphere perfectly onto flat 2d space if you just take one single point out. You just need an infinitely big plane

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
907 points (100.0% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5751 readers
391 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS