399

A recently released Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) document titled “Domestic Terrorism Symbols Guide”* links common protest symbols to “terrorism” — another marker in a common theme of conflating militant protest for social justice with deadly terrorist violence within the United States. Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Brennan Center have raised warnings about such documents, citing inadequate protections for people’s constitutional rights.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 204 points 9 months ago

Labelling Antifa as a terrorist group is basically admitting you are a fascist.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 66 points 9 months ago

I think there's more nuance on the topic than you're implying. While there's no actual group called antifa, there are plenty of groups who oppose far right ideology (i.e. anti-fascist/antifa). Some of these groups have definitely become heavily armed and radicalized. I don't support fascists, but I also don't support radicalized zealots of any creed. Does that make me a fascist?

[-] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 92 points 9 months ago

While I'd prefer peaceful resolutions to our problems, I fully understand why left leaning groups are becoming more radicalized. There is little compromise with the theocrats who want to eliminate or subjugate various minority and underrepresented groups within our society, continually hand more and more power to corporations, wholeheartedly believe the end of days is coming once Israel fully takes control of the holy land, and will scream "Second Amendment" and "Crisis Actors" every time kids are killed in school shootings. They violently stormed the US Capitol many of whole had intent to kill Senators and Representatives.

There is no compromise or peaceful resolution with people who want to hurt you or worse because their pastor said you're a demonic sinner who must be cleansed from the earth.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 24 points 9 months ago

Yeah those fuckers want to kill me for even existing, if i armed up it would be entirely to defend myself.

[-] Caculon@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

So your saying your extremely interested in staying alive? Gotcha!

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

I would greatly prefer to stay alive, yes. Still haven't loaded up on weapons, though.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 75 points 9 months ago

Does that make me a fascist?

No, it makes you a person that probably won't do squat to stop fascists.

It's no coincidence wthat it's only radicals that show up to physically confront fascists while the so-called "enlightened centrists" do nothing but heckle from the sidelines.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As someone who's been in several combat zones with the US military (honorably discharged 10 years ago), I can safely say I do not want my backyard turning into one. So pardon me while I wait for all peaceful options to be utterly exhausted before getting gun-happy and LARPing with others in fatigues while shouting for armed resistance.

If MAGAs or any other "militia" begins marching down my street, I'll sure as shit meet it with force. But until then or an outright coup, I'll continue advocating for peace

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

Nobody's asking you to break out the claymore mines just yet... it's the fascists that are escalating the lethality, not the "scary radical left" opposing them.

It's usually a good idea to try and stop the fash before they march down your street... by the time they do, the politicians might just have decided to hand them the keys to the tanks - which they will, eventually.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

But confronting fascists is good optics for them. They want to be able to point to shit like that to show how oPpReSsEd they are for their oPiNIoNs. It's fuel. Ignore the marches. A news article covering a bunny of dudes waving nazi flags and nobody giving a shit is infinitely optically better than a brawl between nazis and antifa.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

But confronting fascists is good optics for them.

Absolutely not.

Anyone who believes that understands nothing about fascism at all. The pretense of "unopposable strength" is literally the only reason they will show themselves in public - if you don't oppose it forcefully they win by default.

A news article covering a bunny of dudes waving nazi flags

The media will happily ignore fascism. After all, the rich media bosses know who it is that will protect their precious private property for them, just like all the rich people do... that is why they fund fascists - there is no such thing as "grassroots fascism". The fact that antifa's resistance meant they couldn't is literally one of the reasons the US's secret police is now seeing antifa as a threat to the status quo.

Ignoring fascism is no different than ignoring climate change - doing so doesn't make it go away.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What do you think was more optically advantageous for the left, a bunch of patriot front idiots getting arrested just for marching, or antifa and the proud boys brawling?

We're not at the point of civil war. Optics are still more important than punching them.

Actually, portraying your enemy as both strong and weak is crucial to fascism. To nazis, the jews were simultaneously subhuman and also in control of the world. To the alt right, the left is simultaneously soy boy beta cucks and nazi punching radicals. If you remove yourself from their narrative, it fails apart. And instead of brave defenders of western culture under attack from crazy leftist extremists, they simply become weird motherfuckers waving nazi flags in (current year).

I'm not gonna say don't punch nazis, but don't do it in an organized fashion at a rally where they hope to provoke a reaction.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

What do you think was more optically advantageous for the left

Showing the fascists - and their spineless "centrist" allies - that they will face real opposition in the streets. When the fash start marching, that is the only optics that matter.

bunch of patriot front idiots getting arrested just for marching

Arrested by whom? Their KKK and neo-nazi allies you optimistically call "police"?

You don't have to believe me, Clyde... you can hear it straight from a neo-nazi, too.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sooo... you're just going to conveniently ignore this.

And this.

And this.

And this.

And this.

And this.

And, surprise, surprise, this.

At this point I have to ask... are you sure you're not a bit sympathetic to fascism yourself?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SkyeStarfall 10 points 9 months ago

Sure, just "ignore" it, conveniently forgetting they're very much embedded in mainstream politics now and starting culture war campaigns, banning books, and actively attempting to dismantle democracy.

Fascism in the US is already here.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

it seems the less energic options are already exhausted.

i dont want to be on the receiving end of state violence either but i dont think things can change by simply voting or protesting anymore.

this doesnt necessarily mean violence but we must change our strategy.

[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

My stance on Jan 6 was had it been successful and Trump was installed as president, it would have been up to people like you to actually resist the new tyrannical government.

Because at that point, democracy was usurped and the necessary peace transfer of power was ignored for a violent insurrection.

The problem is that J6 was a test run. It was not successful because people with morals, many of whom were registered Republicans, stood firm and said this isn't right. Many of these people have been replaced over the last three years to make stealing an election easier at a state level so that they won't need to steal it at the federal level.

I'm not saying there aren't peaceful options. But one side has already decided that peace is not an option. They showed that they will have their form of government, by force if necessary.

[-] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Oh give it a break.

[-] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Please shut up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Yup. Or when anyone tries to do anything they will just come up with reasons why it's wrong.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

The media was quick to forget that they were literally trying to criminalize the wearing of masks before Covid hit because "Antifa Scary."

So, yeah.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] echutaa@programming.dev 27 points 9 months ago

Maybe with another organization you would have a point, but in the case of the FBI which has been known to aid and recruit fascists I don’t see this holding any water.

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago

Radicals aren't the same as extremists. And that is an important distinction to understand when dealing with politics. Being armed and willing to defend yourself isn't an act of extremism. Being violent towards violent fascists isn't extremism. It's community defense. When you break down politics into it's most base element, it's about the distribution of the legitimate use of violence. Understanding and working within that framework isn't extremism, it's politics 101. Philosophy Tube has a good video on this in relation to fascism. Skip to ~20 mins in for the violence bit.

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

So would you label “maga” as heavily armed and radicalised?

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

So would you label “maga” as heavily armed and ~~radicalised~~ extremified?

FTFY.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The problem is that letting fascist types run rampant and hoping they'll just go away historically doesn't tend to work out well.

I live in Portland. Up until 2021 or so fascists, proud boys, Patriot prayer, etc. All ran rampant in cahoots with local law enforcement. People were menaced, paintballed, attacked and all that. It sucked. The sniveling mayor begged those groups not to come in (they're never local) and act like that. Shockingly they did anyway.

Portland fought back

It was unpleasant, but it worked. Those assholes haven't tried to have their gatherings here in a couple of years. Self described antifa groups are still on edge but have largely diminished in activity. You don't see antifa rallies designed to menace going out to the surrounding small towns where those assholes largely come from. Unless you're sporting some obviously fash flair pretty much everyone gets left alone in town.

Both sides are not the same

That was a good read, tyvm

[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

yes that makes you a fascist.

i think that you should be quiet and postulate that garbage to the dump.

https://www.businessinsider.com/right-wing-extremists-kill-329-since-1994-antifa-killed-none-2020-7

[-] rchive@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

For most of Lemmy, yes, that makes you a fascist.

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 3 points 9 months ago

Well, you know *gestures vaguely at all the far-right stuff going on in the United States"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago

A group can be right and also be violent and extremist.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Not untrue, but antifa in general would cease to exist if fascists stopped coming to cities to menace people

[-] explodicle@local106.com 1 points 9 months ago

In this context they're using "extremist" to mean "goes too far".

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Do they? It didn't really seem like a value judgment to me.

But you can also be right and go to far. I don't know if these groups do go to far, but nuclear annihilation for example would definitely be too far.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 months ago

Isn't their whole thing arguing that terrorist tactics are justified, helpful and necessary? Every time I see antifa supporters talking online that's the thrust of the discussion. What is the case for them not being a terrorist group?

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Oooh... fascists are afraid of scawy antifa - that must mean antifa must be terrorists.

Good job demonstrating how much moral weight you ascribe to the feelings of fascists, Clyde.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 months ago

I'm not sure what any of this has to do with what I said. I'm not talking about moral weight or feelings, and I'm not saying 'terrorist' pejoratively. It's a word, it means something. I don't think its meaning strictly depends on who is in the right, it's more about goals and methods. What do you think it means?

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Who has antifa (supposedly) "terrorized," Clyde?

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

I wonder if my profile pic puts me on that list.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The use or sharing of these symbols or phrases alone should not independently be considered evidence of AVE presence or affiliation or serve as an indicator of illegal activity.

-FBI, in the document referenced.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes, I read what the FBI said. But there have been a million reasons not to 100% trust law enforcement. I'll take what they say with a grain of salt.

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Only if you're dumb enough to just assume whatever a group titles themselves actually reflects their beliefs.

Do you think the Nazis were socialist? How about the Soviets?

You can call yourself whatever you want, if your group is anti fascist and acts in an authoritarian manner, then you're the same thing with a different economic outlook.

[-] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Yes but antifa is anti fascist.

Calling antifa a terrorist organization because in another universe an organization sharing the name could be bad is like banning ice cream because it could be made out of maggots.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
399 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9519 readers
827 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS