284
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ___@lemm.ee 90 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

These micro-examples are a reminder that corruption is a part of every human system, no matter how perfect the design.

There will always be concertgoers cutting the unwatched fence to sneak in for free.

The only plausible solution is elective transparency. Either your company and financial metadata are available for independent third party review, and records retained as defined, or else you’re not a company.

Don’t ascribe to it, get boycotted.

[-] sv1sjp@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

The plausible solution is named Blockchain and smart contracts. Until then...

[-] Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 59 points 11 months ago

Cryptocurrency is the number one vector for scams and money laundering today despite blockchains.

[-] 520@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

That's because transactions can't be rolled back, opening accounts doesn't require identifying info, and there's no possibility of payments being intercepted by a third party.

Sure, fiat can be safer when your bank is being responsible. It can be much more dangerous when they aren't. Just ask a victim of Wells Fargo.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago

Okay. I’ll answer seriously to this. Blockchain can’t store an entire contract (not within reason). Likewise, contracts will never be made public. So at most you’ll get is a pointer to where the contract is held. The contents of the contract can be changed (though you could put a checksum in the chain too), but that still doesn’t address things. Also if you are concerned about “well no one else has a contract” then all that needs to happen is everyone gets a contract, then the chain is inundated with contracts and all you’d have is a pointer and a checksum and you have no idea what’s in the actual contract.

[-] loke@fedia.io 22 points 11 months ago

Not only that. Backroom deals without public documentation has been done since the beginning of humanity.

Even if blockchains were widely used, these things would happen outside the blockhain and no one would be the wiser.

[-] isles@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Blockchain can’t store an entire contract (not within reason).

What do you mean by this? I don't work directly with blockchain, but it appears Eth has a 12MB block limit, which is 10,000 pages of simple text.

[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

A block isn’t a single transaction. It’s way too inefficient to scale that way

A block is a group of transactions

[-] isles@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Sure, that makes sense, so it looks like each contract could only be 20 pages of text, at least per transaction.

[-] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

A contract is text only, that would be a few kb at most when compressed… blockchain can definitely hold that, it can hold images, and someone even put Doom on the blockchain.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] Neato@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Blockchain has no viable uses. Append only databases already exist. Distributed databases already exists. It's all a scam.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
284 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59334 readers
4859 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS