583
submitted 11 months ago by RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Eh, as long as you don't update it its extremely stable. And it's a UNIX system so you can still do shenanigans if you're still inclined.

[-] RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml 22 points 11 months ago

That is an interesting sentence: as long as you don’t update it’s extremely stable

But this is more about macOS having no package manager (officially), telemetry and such

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I know, and trust me, I hate Apple for essentially breaking my computer after an update. But I had my MacBook for 6 years now, use it daily, and have no hiccups other wise.

Yeah, back when I was playing around with terminal not having a package manager was a huge pain in the ass.

[-] Octopus1348@thelemmy.club 7 points 11 months ago
[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

At the time I couldn't get it to work. It's been years though

[-] BURN@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I still don’t get the love for package managers.

As a windows and Mac user who has tried to use Linux multiple times I can’t stand the centralized managers. They never have what I need and then it ends up out of date and not working.

Is there some hidden benefit I’m missing? Because sourcing from the developer seems like the much better way to do it like Mac and Windows.

[-] RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

1.Security 2.Up to date depends on distro, rolling releases have more up to date software 3. Convenience: just open the app center and click install

[-] BURN@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Security: if they leave checksums on their website I don’t see how it’s any more secure

Up to date: I definitely haven’t had this experience. Multiple times on arch I had issues where an outdated repo caused an app to not be able to boot

Convenience: That’s subjective. I’ve never really seen much convenience from an all in one solution for anything. I find it more of a hassle to find the distro specific manager that has a terrible UI rather than just downloading directly off a web page

[-] CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

Easy: Nothing beats the simplicity of brew install whatever or apt install whatever, and then having whatever just work, in my experience, pretty much every single time.

[-] Pok@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Click download on the webpage Drag downloaded app to wherever you want to store it Open app

It's just a matter of what you're used to.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Packet managers are quicker to use. They also keep everything up to date.

[-] BURN@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Personally I find them slower and less convenient. Like they said, it’s easier to do what you’re used to.

[-] BURN@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I’ve not had that experience. I’ve had to go hunting down package names on google before I can install it using the package manager, when instead I could have just downloaded it from their website.

Apt, brew and whatever Arch has have all had the same problems for me. They almost never work out of the box and they’re a major reason I don’t like using Linux on desktop.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
583 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21197 readers
79 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS