251
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by DolphinMath@slrpnk.net to c/world@lemmy.world

The Israel Defense Forces releases surveillance camera footage from Shifa Hospital showing Hamas terrorists bringing a Nepali and Thai citizen who were abducted from Israel on October 7 to the medical center.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Catoblepas 3 points 1 year ago

Super cool how lying about hospitals not being bombed is "civil" but calling it out for the lie that it is somehow isn't.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Attacking the contents of an article is absolutely allowed, attacking other users is absolutely NOT allowed.

So in your comment:

"Liar. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/11/14/gaza-unlawful-israeli-hospital-strikes-worsen-health-crisis"

That's fine. "Liar" is maybe a little strong, I personally would have allowed it, other mods may not have. Your mileage may vary.

It was the personal attack against the other user AFTER that where you crossed the line and caused the comment to be removed.

[-] Catoblepas 4 points 1 year ago

I disagree that saying someone is ignorant or that I would STFU if I was that ignorant is a personal attack. I also do not see how that is somehow more objectionable than lying about bombed civilians.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's literally an ad hominem attack and is not allowed.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

You've also been warned about this before according to the modlog (which is public information):

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&userId=82695

If you keep it up, you're cruising for a temporary ban.

[-] Catoblepas 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I haven’t received notifications for any of those other warnings as far as I can tell, the links in the log won’t actually load for me. I also stand by them and encourage everyone to check out my forbidden opinions. It’s hilarious that one of them is literally a single sentence of me asking a mod for clarification.

Btw, why is lying about murdered civilians fine but calling someone ignorant is beyond the pale?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not all mods bother replying to comments they remove, I choose to because I believe transparency is an important part of moderation.

As to the question, engaging in personal attacks violates rule 5 in the sidebar (which I wrote BTW):

"Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!"

[-] Catoblepas 2 points 1 year ago

Ok, I understand that your stance is that ignorance is not a neutral statement of fact but a personal attack, and I do appreciate you replying unlike the last mod I asked that just deleted my comment without answering. Which I also had no idea about because I don’t monitor the mod log of every place I comment.

It’s just a really awful policy for the exact reason I’ve been underlining over and over: if polite lies about mass murder are fine and calling someone ignorant for saying heinous shit isn’t fine, you’re just creating an environment where impoliteness is worse than bigotry. And yeah I see the rules against that, doesn’t seem to be doing anything about the overt lie that hospitals haven’t been bombed.

“It’s the rules” is a terrible justification for leaving up lies about mass murdered civilians as long as they’re polite.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If the facts are on your side, I absolutely encourage you to refute incorrect information, just don't attack the other user in the process.

"I'm sorry, you're wrong. - Link."

"Reality disagrees. - Link."

That's all cool.

Ad hominem attacks cross the line. When you start going after the other user, that's a problem and we don't want flamewar threads top to bottom. That's why the rule exists.

[-] Catoblepas 2 points 1 year ago

If you don't want flame wars then removing obvious flame bait--like lies about mass murdered civilians and hospitals not being bombed--would go a lot farther than deleting everyone that calls that shit what it is.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've explained the mod position multiple times. It's not up for debate. You're now starting to shade over into a different form of disingenuous argument affectionately called "sealioning".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

From here:

https://wondermark.com/c/1k62/

Don't argue with mods. You can't win, you can only get removed or banned.

[-] Catoblepas 3 points 1 year ago

If you want to run a community where it's more offensive to say someone is ignorant than it is to lie about mass murdered civilians I'm not under the delusion that I can make you do anything else. Just don't expect me to not say it's a shitty policy or to ignore what it allows and what it doesn't allow.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Catoblepas 2 points 1 year ago

So the rule actually isn't "don't make personal attacks", it's "don't tell the mods that their policies are bad." Maybe you should add that to the sidebar.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Repeated sealioning. 7 day ban.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
251 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2533 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS