311

SpaceX’s Starship rocket system reached several milestones in its second test flight before the rocket booster and spacecraft exploded over the Gulf of Mexico.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Which is why I'm nervous for when they decide to start doing manned flights.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Falcon 9 is the most reliable rocket in the world and it used to explode like this too. It’ll be 5-10 years of successful unmanned flights before anyone rides on this rocket.

[-] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

And what of worker safety at Space X?

Reuters documented at least 600 previously unreported workplace injuries at Musk’s rocket company: crushed limbs, amputations, electrocutions, head and eye wounds and one death.

It's not the rocket or the engineering I'm concerned about, it's the push to meet deadlines at the expense of safety.

[-] kobra@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

You literally said you were concerned for manned flight in your last comment. So originally it was the rocket and engineering you were concerned about.

[-] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I said I was concerned because of the corner cutting, which isn't an engineering problem

[-] kobra@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That might’ve been what you intended but it is not what you said. You didn’t bring that up until your 2nd comment.

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

You literally said you were concerned for manned flight in your last comment

You're oh so slightly twisting the dude's words. What he said was:

Which is why I'm nervous for when they decide to start doing manned flights.

This could be expressing concern about the flights themselves, or about something that happens around the time the decision to start doing manned flights is taken - like cutting corners that leads to employees getting injured.

Dude even clarified what he meant, and you're like "nope, I won't accept that"?

[-] Neato@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Was NASA exploding rockets this frequently when they pioneered all of this decades ago? It only took NASA 8 years to go from first entering space to landing on the moon. SpaceX is nowhere close to that and they've been launching rockets for 17 years.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Damn you clearly know nothing about space flight history. Tell me, what agency has the most spaceflight deaths? I’ll give you a hint: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_spaceflight-related_accidents_and_incidents

[-] Neato@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Damn you clearly know nothing about technological development. Elon stands on the shoulders of all those who gave their lives in the past. He benefits from all the safety regulations.

And still with all of that. The tens of billions of dollars the government hands out to him. And more than twice the time of the Space Race he had accomplished so little. How many successful rockets did NASA develop in that time? A lot more than SpaceX.

[-] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Rocket go up Rocket blow up Stonk go up

[-] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Different design processes and NASA has to appease Congress who likes to cut funding if a rocket blows up.

But the Design-build-test-break-redesign-etc process that SpaceX uses is cheaper, quicker, and gives more data.

[-] brothershamus@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago
[-] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Look how long it took to develop SLS and how much money was spent, and then how much each launch costs. And the moment Starship is complete SLS will be obsolete.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

No, but the resources given and the requirements set are different. The Saturn V did not have to be reusable and was awarded two orders of magnitude more funding. Which is ultimately why it stopped being made.

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago

It took 8 Years AND $25 billions ($248 billions adjusted to today's dollar value).

For comparison NASA awarded a contract for spacex to develop the Human Landing System, the value of the contract is $2.89 billions.

[-] porkins@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Exploding rockets is totally common in rocket science. In fact, their mission objective wasn’t even for the rocket to succeed at making it to space. When you put millions of pounds of fuel into a tube and heat it up, there is a lot to take into account. No one has ever launched anything this big, so they are going to have to iterate quite a few times. Even the computer models can’t catch everything. Sometimes it is as stupid as a bad part manufacturer.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

The US government has a pretty good track record on making sure astronauts don't die.

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
311 points (100.0% liked)

News

23274 readers
2946 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS