713
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago

Good. Even if nobody likes 'murica, their weapons work well enough to deter China from doing something stupid.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Imagine if the roles were reversed, and it was China arming i.e. Panama. How would you feel then?

(Because the USA has done a lot of "something stupid"s as well).

Edit: Folks, you can analyze the bigger picture without being a tankie. It's unfortunate that so many ex-Redditors would rather block and report any display of critical thought

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

Imagine if the roles were reversed, and it was China arming i.e. Panama. How would you feel then

False equivalence, Panama's risk of being suddenly invaded in the current political climate is nearly zero. Taiwan (is #1), on the other hand, has to be ever vigilant. Also, Panama doesn't house the 'rightful' government of the US.

[-] steven@infosec.pub 7 points 2 years ago
[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Same deal. They've suffered an unjust embargo, sure, but are under no real threat of invasion.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I probably should have said Cuba in my main comment. Doesn't look like it helped people understand, though!

[-] cjsolx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

There's nothing to understand, it's the same situation. Neither Panama nor Cuba are currently under threat from the USA. The USA does not claim ownership over either, and is not threatening their sovereignty.

You're the one not understanding the false equivalency.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Would you feel comfortable with China putting weapons on Cuba? Because the US got real upset last time, and as you said, the US doesn't even have plans to invade Cuba (anymore)

[-] cjsolx@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It would be irksome, sure. But there is no amount of weaponry that China could supply Cuba with that would threaten the USA (short of nukes), so it would be a moot point. Business as usual. Taiwan similarly has no hope of success in attacking China, regardless of how many weapons the USA provides. Meaning: this only works one way, and if China is upset about that then maybe they should keep their eyes (and hands) within their own borders and everything will be fine.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Obviously they're different. But failing to empathize when given the analogy shows either the inability or unwillingness to understand China's position.

[-] JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

it's just a poor analogy, not worth taking seriously.

[-] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I understand the PRC's position just fine because they've been explicit about it for decades: They believe that Taiwan, an island they've never controlled, is theirs by imperial right based on the Qing dynasty's rule over it for ~200 years prior to 1900.

We don't need to "empathize" with a desire for imperial conquest, we just need to stand in the way of it.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The US wouldn't be arming Taiwan if China wasn't making the claim that it is part of China. Taiwan poses literally zero threat to china. There is no US comparison here.

It's the same shit with Ukraine and Russia, and China is watching closely. It's probably easier politically for Republicans to fund a nation not in conflict, because the deterrence doesn't look like as big a win for Biden, so this is why they intelligently to along with it.

[-] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

From Wikipedia:

Taiwan, officially the Republic of China (ROC), is a country in East Asia.

What were you saying?

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

What's your point? Did you just stop there and not read the next sentence that says "It is located at the junction of the East and South China Seas in the northwestern Pacific Ocean, with the People's Republic of China (PRC) to the northwest"?

[-] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

My point is that Taiwan IS a part of China. Two different governments but the same country. And both say they are the "real" China.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wait until you hear about the official names of China, or North and South Korea

(For the uninitiated: People's Republic of China, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, and Republic of Korea. Tl;dr there's more than one issue if you're going off the country's official name for which land they own)

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I'll piss on the CCP any day of the week, thank you very much. I'm a communist, by the way.

[-] Nobsi@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

Nobody needs to understand chinas positions. They are irrelevant.

[-] cjsolx@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

If you're comparing China/Taiwan circumstances to USA/Panama I'm sorry but I cannot call that a critical thought. The only similarity is proximity.

[-] NAXLAB@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

As an American who knows how evil our government is, I would be like "good for panama but also China is probably not doing this out of justice and freedom"

[-] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

Neither is the US. We're doing it because Taiwan is a strategic ally

[-] roboticide@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's fine! We should not invade Panama. I don't think the US is currently planning on it, but after the last 20 years I'm pretty sure most citizens would be fucking glad for any excuse for our military to think twice before invading a foreign country.

[-] Arcity@feddit.nl 6 points 2 years ago

Countries helping arm one another is good. Every country should have the capacity to defend itself. My country got steamrolled during WWII because we had few and outdated wapens

[-] Franzia 5 points 2 years ago

Gives me Cuban Missile Crisis vibes.

I'm not as happy that the US sells arms, but I'm convinced by the geopolitical climate that arming Ukraine and now I might add arming Taiwan is better for the world than worse. Refilling Israel's Iron Dome is probably a good idea too, though we are yet to see what the US sends and how defensive or offensive those weapons we send are.

There might be better comparisons though in the weird chess games we played in the middle east with Russia. They armed some insurgents, we armed some insurgents, etc. Afghanistan was a disaster for Russia too, though it was worse for us.

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
713 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48699 readers
1970 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS