229

AI companies have all kinds of arguments against paying for copyrighted content (www.theverge.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

AI companies have all kinds of arguments against paying for copyrighted content::The companies building generative AI tools like ChatGPT say updated copyright laws could interfere with their ability to train capable AI models. Here are comments from OpenAI, StabilityAI, Meta, Google, Microsoft and more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 39 points 1 year ago

As I’ve said before: Sure, go ahead, train on copyrighted material, but anything AI generates shouldn’t be copyrightable either - it wasn’t created by a human.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

That's exactly the way it is now.

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

Not where I live. In the U.K. copyright for AI generated works is owned by the person that caused the AI to create the work. See s178 and s9(3) of the Copyright, Design and Patent Act of 1987.

[-] Black616Angel@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Problem is that small modifications already make it copyrightable again.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023

229 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59017 readers

2543 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS