718

A second teacher at a high school in Missouri was put on leave after administrators discovered her OnlyFans side hustle.

Megan Gaither, 31, said during an interview with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that she was placed on leave from her English teaching and varsity cheerleading coach position on Oct. 27 after district officials found out about her account on the OnlyFans platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lizzy_Wizzy@lemm.ee 58 points 1 year ago

Imagine giving a shit if someone makes porn in their free time.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I had a home ec teacher that was found out to do playboy spreads. As a young teenager I did not care. My parents did not care(they were hippies). Who cared the most were dumbass older teenage boys for some reason writing her porn name on the chalkboard before she came in one day. It was like they were angry at her for turning them on. That’s when I realized men’s sex education and support for processing complex thought and feelings around relationships and sex is abysmal.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 43 points 1 year ago

It might not have been about making them horny. They just found something to bully the teacher about and used it. Teenagers are monsters.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 14 points 1 year ago

Teenagers raised by monsters are monsters.

[-] Roflol@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, seen plenty monstrous teenagers with decent parents. But with monster parent its more likely monster teenagers.

But maybe your right, i cant see inside homes, maybe all monster teenagers have parental deficiencies.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago

Actually agree.

IMHO we are entirely the product of our environment and upbringing: initially a blank slate. Deficiency or poison in either produces problems.

Sometime those deficiencies and poisons are parents.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Nah, there are definitely correlation and causation in a lot of cases but there are definitely also kids who are just born evil, as if they're infuriated at the world for their having been born.

They're a rare breed but far too dangerous to write off when discussing things that affect the public.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago

I fundamentally disagree that someone can be born evil.

Someone can be born a psychopath, but they can still be raised to logically understand the norms of society and mimic them.

There are, however, a couple of generations born with lead poisoning from leaded petrol: that will stop a brain functioning properly.

[-] Roflol@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

How can you be so sure?

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

As a young teenager I did not care.

Were you a young teenage girl? Because you seem to completely lack understanding of teenage boys' psychology. There's absolutely no reason they would be angry at her for making them horny. That makes no sense at all.

I would agree with your other replier on this. Furthering that, I would say this is the teenage boys' attempt to challenge authority by undermining her authority with her open sexuality as a tool. They found a leverage to have power over her. And they're going to use it to the full extent. They're at a point in time of their growth where they find their social hierarchy. Almost every male mammal engages in this. They pick fights and they learn where they stand by winning and losing. And they want to get as high as possible. This explains the anger that you pointed out, because challenging authority and fighting is inherently similar emotion to anger.

[-] Lizzy_Wizzy@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Please let the adults who are educated continue discussing these topics. Literally everything you just said was wrong.

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

If you're an adult, you should learn to address the argument, not make ad hominem attacks.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dear kavanaugh,

Stop raping women and pretending like it’s just the beer talking.

We sincerely hate you,

Women.

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

You still lack the ability to address the content. You're just spewing out things you're familiar with. You're not actually engaging in any discussion.

No one should rape anyone. I don't see how this is relevant to this discussion.

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Which part of what he said was wrong?

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Apparently nothing. Since I've had 0 actual counter argument so far. All I got is name calling and starwman.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because you seem to completely lack understanding of teenage boys’ psychology. There’s absolutely no reason they would be angry at her for making them horny. That makes no sense at all.

Ah. I see you are one of those types of bigots.

As you surely didn’t forget a whole array of other non binary genders some of which actually get beaten to death for ‘turning straight men on.’

Also some cultures will stone women for ‘turning men on enough to rape them’. That has nothing to do with ‘challenging authority’ in fact it’s gross you even compare it to that. It’s all about attacking vulnerable.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If you don't understand or respect your emotions it isnt like you suddenly don't have them, you still do you just don't know what to do with them.

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Humans are social creatures. We are affected direct and indirectly by other people whether you like it or not (unless you want to become a hikikomori).

The fact that other people give a shit about about someone making porn in their free time, should make you give a shit. This is irrelevant to whether you think they should give a shit or not. Your lack of ability to give a shit signals your lack of foresight into how this affects your life as well as lack of social skills. If she wants to be an OF model, and therefore chooses to do OF content, that's fine. If she wants to be a teacher and thinks she can do OF without consequence, she's stupid.

[-] Lizzy_Wizzy@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

L take and completely wrong. Fuck people for not only judging for something harmless, but also for directly impacting her life because of it when she didn't impact anyone else's.

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What part am I wrong about? Her OF account has clearly affected her job as a teacher. The evidence of what I said is right there. You're in denial of facts of what has already occurred. If she didn't see this coming, she's stupid.

I don't care if you think people shouldn't be judgmental. You're being judgement of me right now. And I am of you right now. People always are, always have been and always will. That's how humans work. Your denial or calling it out as bad is irrelevant in your ability to plan for the future.

Edit: Let me be clear. I am not defending the judgmental. I am pointing out the lack of social understanding.

[-] Lizzy_Wizzy@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

In that same vain then, I shouldn't dress "slutty" in public otherwise I'm just asking to get raped right? Get fucked.

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because you couldn't point out what was wrong, you decided to take a strawman? No, that is not the same vain. The logic isn't consistent.

It would be: If she doesn't want to get raped, she should take precautions based on the risks involved.

If this teacher doesn't want to be fired, she should understand that there are risks that follow her actions.

If I follow your logic, the statement of the teacher would become:

She must've wanted to get fired, so she did OF. No, the predicate the consequences are backwards.

Being stupid is not a defense. And your argument is illogical.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

She must have wanted to be raped or she wouldn't have dressed like that.

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

No, that is not the same vain. The logic isn't consistent.

It would be: If she doesn't want to get raped, she should take precautions based on the risks involved.

If this teacher doesn't want to be fired, she should understand that there are risks that follow her actions.

If I follow your logic, the statement of the teacher would become:

She must've wanted to get fired, so she did OF. No, the predicate the consequences are backwards.

Being stupid is not a defense. And your argument is illogical.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Victim blaming and I don't think you know how logic works.

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I did not victim blame. I wish logic and/or discrete mathematics is a requirement education in the world. Then we wouldn't be having this conversation.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Being a social creature doesn't mean you get veto power over how others live their lives. Your justification thus falls flat as does your victim blaming argument.

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

When you were little, did you parents teach you to look both ways before crossing the street? Even when you're at a stop sign or at a green light? Probably, since you're still alive. Why did they do that? You'd be in the right. If a car hit you, you'd be the victim, 100%. But you do that anyway because being right or being the victim is completely irrelevant. It's not about who gets the blame. It's about what gives you the best outcome. You looking both ways before crossing the street has the best outcome for you. It doesn't matter if you're right if you're fucking dead.

If she wanted the best outcome of staying as a teacher, she shouldn't have done OF. This should be a very easy deductive logic people should be able to make given what is the current society.

This is not victim blaming. I lean quite far left, and this is one of the most insanely annoying thing I find about the left. Far too many only look about who's the victim and whose to blame. That shit is fucking stupidest outlook on life. It's a good goal to attain, a world without problem causing things. But unless utopia happens, you need to learn to figure out how the world works. Failure to do that simply means you're stupid. You might be a victim, but you're still stupid.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Your analogy is false. This is victim blaming and a gross violation of privacy. On your off time you are free to do what you want your employer is not paying you for that time.

You sound like one of those no-fap types btw.

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

How is my analogy false? How did I victim blame? What did I blame her of? I said nothing of such. You're going to have to substantiate your claim.

I masterbate and have no issues others materbating. In fact I already said it's fine if she wants to do OF.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not on me to justify your analogy. You must really hate woman who have sexuality

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If she wants to be a teacher and thinks she can do OF without consequence, she’s stupid.

This comment reeks of trying to control women’s sexuality.

Meanwhile you probably think ‘good job’ when firefighters make a topless calendar and have no qualms if they show up to put out the fires.

You smell of double standard vomit.

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not trying to control her sexuality. I, in fact, said it's fine if she wants to do OF. So you have read me wrong. I pointed out people's inability to predict the future.

You have judged me for judging on things I didn't say. You smell of hypocrisy.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Probably not a popular take but I can at least understand it from the perspective of it just being easier to put her on paid leave than to play whackamole punishing every kid who starts bullying her or disrespecting her because stupid teenagers.

It's the dumbfuck no tolerance logic that inadvertently encourages kids to respond to being bullied by pulling a knife since they gettin' punished either way for being in a fight, but it does make the twisted kind of sense you can expect from admins who hate nothing more than doing their jobs instead of sitting at their desk playing minesweeper all day.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Perpetuating the stigma isn't going to help either. Kids take their cues from adults.

[-] markon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Somebody's gotta do it! 😁

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
718 points (100.0% liked)

News

23281 readers
3342 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS