589
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blazera@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Sure. See, im not gonna buy this game, and Im gonna still have my $90 dollars.

Someone else who does want that early access for $90 will get what they want.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

That's not even you voting with your wallet. That's just you not buying a thing because it's too expensive. That's an example of price elasticity

Voting with your wallet is this flawed concept that consumers can control companies through individuals boycotting their products.

For example, I uninstalled hearthstone and quit Blizzard along with many others back when they let China censor a US esports player who commented on Hong Kong protests. But now I wouldn't buy anyways, because their games suck and their payment schemes are obscene

All they know is they lost n customers in that time period, and failed to recover m

[-] blazera@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

That’s just you not buying a thing because it’s too expensive.

yeah, that's what Im doing. I am not hurt in anyway by not buying this thing, no one is making me buy it. That is an option for literally everyone, no one has to buy it. Im not a protesting activist trying to change Blizzard, Im simply not affected by this. The only people that are, are people that want to pay $90 for early access. If they dont want to, nobody is making them.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's fine. I'm also not interested, because i don't play wow anymore

But the phrase "voting with your wallet" is a term loaded with a narrative to justify everything under capitalism, from anti-consumer behaviors to blaming working people for climate change. Neoconservatives and Libertarians use the idea for how deregulation and privitization is the solution to everything

You don't seem to believe in that nonsense, so I'd encourage you to not use the phrase

[-] blazera@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Wha youre the one that brought it up

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Huh, yeah fair enough, your post just had that energy.

I mean, obviously you don't have to buy a game, but saying just "you don't have to buy the product from the company being anti-consumer" sounds a lot like a defense of them, you know?

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
589 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16745 readers
535 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS