2150
submitted 1 year ago by ByroTriz@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ownership is when one is allowed to keep all others from accessing or using a thing.

If that one is a person or corp., or the thing is physical or imaginary, it doesn't change the nature of ownership itself.

A person or a corp could make different choices with their ownership rights. And ownership of physical or imaginary things have different enforcement challenges. But none of that changes the fundamental concept of ownership.

But as I said elsewhere: "The real point I meant is that fake concepts can still be useful. Like the concept of ownership."

[-] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

ownership of tangibles and intangibles (specifically information) are entirely different, regardless how you wanna define ownership or whatever.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago

The enforcement of that ownership is entirely different, yes.
Basically the only way to maintain ownership of intangibles is to keep them a secret.

Also, don't all intangibles fit the definition of information? I don't recall running across any that wouldn't, but I'm curious. Can you give an example of what you mean?

[-] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

i couldn't think of anything either I was just covering all my bases lol

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
2150 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32142 readers
928 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS