226
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mamertine@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Fuck Taco Bell. Taco Bell only won because Taco John's didn't have deep enough pockets to defend the trademarked term they legally had.

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 146 points 1 year ago

Look, fuck the gross Yum Brands mega conglomerate, but the idea that someone could own the trademark to "Taco Tuesday" is fucking ridiculous.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the US, where the rules are made up and the goalposts are set by the deepest pockets.

[-] whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What makes it fucking stupid? Is it because it reaches a critical mass of usage, so the people get to take it back? Something else?

As an aside, I have a new product idea: Zoidberg’s Super Bowl of Cereal: I’m Lovin’ It!

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Is it because it reaches a critical mass of usage, so the people get to take it back?

It's not my point but that's literally how it legally works in the US. That's why Velcro insists on calling their product "Velcro brand hook and loop fastener"

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam 5 points 1 year ago

That's actually pretty common too. Just off the top of my head: Cleanex, Xerox and Nintendo have all had to do similar things to protect their trademark.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Escalator was once a brand name.

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

They really started padding it towards the end to get to 50 but the first half or so of this listicle has a lot of good examples, quite a few that I didn't know

https://www.impactplus.com/blog/50-everyday-words-that-started-as-brands-and-trademarks

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

And those are brand names. This is just a generic promotion of a common product on a particular weekday. Which day is obvious because it alliterates with the food. Surely most people were surprised to hear anyone claimed to own the concept. Has it not been occasionally present at every cafeteria throughout their life?

[-] whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

TIL about trademark erosion. Also, thanks for a proper response.

Trademark erosion, or genericization, is a special case of antonomasia related to trademarks. It happens when a trademark becomes so common that it starts being used as a common name and the original company has failed to prevent such use.

I guess Nintendo fought it successfully by getting the world to call the thing a “game console” rather than calling it a Nintendo. Hoover failed to defend the verb “Hoover” and lost it.

In this case, it just seems like the win is for Taco Bell and their efforts to gain, use and profit from the term. And that makes it feel a little gross and brutish. They could prove me wrong though.

[-] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 year ago

It's a food item and a day of the week.

Yeah, "super bowl" also shouldn't be trade marked, It's far too generalized to be reasonable. Zoidberg should be as that is a character in a show and should be claimed by the creators with exception given to people whom have that name in real life referring to their own products.

I'm lovin' it also shouldn't be trademarked. It's literally just an expression of joy.

I don't get why this has to be a difficult concept. McDonald's didn't create anything new. The NFL didn't fabricate the concept of extraordinary dishware. It is absolutely nonsense that anyone with enough money and influence can just choose a couple pre-existing words out of the English language and claim ownership.

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

They should have never been granted the trademark based on prioriry. They did not coin or use the term first. They are not fighting because they know they wouldn't survive a challenge which is why they just bullied small shops who themselves didn't have the pockets to defend themselves.

[-] ExecutiveStapler@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

I don't think that's what happened? Based on this article and another one I read, it seems that now the Taco Tuesday trademark is relinquished meaning anyone can use it. I'm guessing taco bell would rather everyone be able to use it including them rather than it being locked down by someone who's not them.

[-] LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Indeed that was the case:

According to The Strange History of Taco Tuesday, the promotional phrase was started in 1982 by a chain called Taco John’s based out of Cheyenne, Wyoming. In fact, Taco John’s placed a registered trademark on the phrase in 1989 to attach it to their brand. They filed a lawsuit against another restaurant chain after seeing that it was used, but the lawsuit resulted in bad press, so they have stopped enforcing their trademark. They still use it as their brand’s signature, and rightfully so!

https://bennystacos.com/taco-tuesday-legendary-tradition/

So Taco John gave up the trademark and now any restaurant can advertise "Taco Tuesday" specials.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

My understanding is Taco John’s used to prevent smaller shops from using it

[-] ReadyUser31@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Do you really want Taco John's to hold the usage rights to 'taco Tuesday'?

load more comments (15 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
226 points (100.0% liked)

News

23397 readers
3194 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS