Is kbin.social anti-corporation? Should it be? (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by shepherd@kbin.social to c/kbinMeta@kbin.social

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm seeing discussions on other instances about how a "federated" corporate instance should be handled, i.e. Meta, or really any major company.

What would kbin.social's stance be towards federating/defederating with a Meta instance?

Or what should that stance be?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Melpomene@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For example, federating with the intention of driving other instances out of existence by dominating the space.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

that's not an example, intentions dont matter if they cant act on them. How can they act in bad faith?

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023

71 points (100.0% liked)

/kbin meta

39 readers

1 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago