38
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by pineapplelover@lemm.ee to c/foss@beehaw.org

My life is pretty disorganized with stuff at school, work, and extracurriculars. For a few months now I've been encouraged to get a planner instead of keeping it all in my head. Now don't get me wrong, I love taking physical notes and doing homework on paper with my nice pens and such. However, I do need a planner that syncs from my phone, laptop, and desktop.

I've been scouring for an open source solution to all this and a few months ago, I found Super Productivity. It had pretty much all of what I needed, places to put down tasks, a pomodoro timer, clients for desktop and mobile, and a place to see my progress. I didn't use its syncing features though, because, it only allows dropbox, webdav, and local file sync. I thought it was pretty incomplete.

Over the course of this week I realized that I had a NAS that I could access outside of home so I could sync everything with my synology drive folder, allowing uploading and downloading of the .json file across all my devices. This works extremely well and very seamlessly. Now, I have a completely open source solution that doesn't really ping any servers apart from saving a .json file locally and then syncing to my server. It's a dream come true and works works amazingly.

After seeing how much this piece of software has transformed my life, I am hoping to share this and hope you guys will start using it as well and support this dev. Planners usually cost me around $10 or so, I'll probably give the dev at least that much once my paycheck rolls in.

https://github.com/johannesjo/super-productivity

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 0x4E4F@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

Too bad it's MIT licensed, but oh well, nothing's perfect 🤷.

[-] inson1@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago
[-] magikmw@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago
[-] inson1@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago
[-] T0RB1T@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Weaker copyleft. Doesn't guarantee freedom the way GPL does.

If someone were to make a proprietary derivative using the MIT licensed code, that would be allowed. Their source code changes aren't required to be shared and licensed under a FLOSS license.

GPL on the other hand, guarantees (legally, not always in practice) that any derivatives are to be licensed the same way, so they must remain FLOSS.

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
38 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17941 readers
48 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS