200
submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/science@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 year ago

So, is this an open door to scare people away from fruit?

[-] livus@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago

@qyron fruit is healthy.

The fructose in fruit isn't as easily absorbed due to fibre. Also there's a natural limit to how much we can consume, no one eats 20 oranges in one sitting.

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

That sounds like a challenge to me...

[-] livus@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@FleetingTit I'm still haunted by that scene in Se7en where the guy has "striations" in his stomach from being forced to over eat.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

no one eats 20 oranges in one sitting

Unless they are looking for a serious case of the runs.

But I admit to have over indulged on this particular fruit more than once.

[-] livus@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

@qyron grapefruit is my particular achilles heel!

Nevertheless we are physically limited by our stomach capacity and would be very unlikely to consume bioavailable fructose at the rates made possible by industrial fructose such as HFCS.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

The runs? No. A run to the store to buy more Tums is more likely.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

When in doubt, both!

[-] msage@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

So like freshly squeezed orange juice in large quantities?

[-] livus@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@msage even that isn't as hard on the liver as processed orange juice that has no fibre in it. But it's the things that have extra fructose added into them that I would be wary of.

An Australian guy did a documentary where he ate the exact same number of calories he'd eaten before, and worked out just as much, but he went for food with added fructose. It's really interesting.

That Sugar Film.

[-] java@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, the study is talking about other sources of fructose:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oby.23920

The study is not saying that fructose is the root cause of obesity from what I see (search doesn't work properly there). I'm not sure if in such a complex mechanism as a human body a single cause of obesity can exist. Additionally, our bodies differ and a single mutation can change the outcome of the whole process from what I know.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

The title is so misleading that it borders on lying.

The root cause of all obesity everywhere is not fructose. That implies that if you don't eat fructose or generate fructose, you will not be obese. Fructose might be contributing factor to obesity, but it is hardly a root cause or "the" root cause.

[-] 0xD@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

No, the title is completely correct - but you should read the article accompanying it ;) Have you tried it?

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

I overstepped on my comment but after years of being vehiculated as an healthy sugar, this is the kind of title capable of triggering that sort of thought.

And agreed. It may be a part of the problem but it is risky to say this or that is the root of the obesity problem.

[-] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

this comment is an open door to brain rot

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
200 points (100.0% liked)

Science

3155 readers
1 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS