200
submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/science@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bizarroland@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I believe this will mark the end of this particular conversation, not because I won, and not because you won, but because we cannot debate on the same level.

If you ever do learn about what I'm calling the LMNOPs of the human nutrition alphabet then definitely feel free to express your new thoughts to me anytime you want to.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Since the article in question is discussing obesity and I named the root cause of obesity and then you immediately agreed that nobody can argue with that root cause(consuming more calories then you burn), we'll say I "won" for the sake of accuracy.

Following your concession , you propped up unrelated tangential anecdotes about nutrition that you quicotically argued against.

It is not a matter of debate; you are bringing up and answering your own straw man arguments that I have not engaged with because they are your own questions and answers you have made up in your meandering monologue unrelated to the undisputed fact that obesity is caused by eating too much food.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
200 points (100.0% liked)

Science

3155 readers
1 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS