646
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] S_204@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. History shows us that they will continue to bomb until they get their people back.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

nah, history shows that they will keep bombing Gaza until the imaginary blood price has been paid.

[-] S_204@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You clearly don't understand the history of the region. Israel has given back the Golan to the Lebanese, the Sinai to the Egyptians and Gaza to the Palestinians.

If you leave them alone, they'll leave you alone. If you fuck with them, they've shown they will grind your bones into dust indistinguishable from the rubble of the buildings you're hiding your missiles in.

That's what history tells us. Hamas is about to get a history lesson.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

your not very good with history are you?

Golan, considered Syrian under Israeli occupation by everyone but the USA (and that only during trumps presidency)

Sinai, forced peaceful withdrawal by American and Various European nations to open up the Suez

Gaza, an open air concentration camp

[-] S_204@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Are you trying to claim Israel hasn't given back lands they captured while being attacked in the Golan and Sinai?

Just want to be clear about this.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

so, again: Golan: under Israeli occupation right now, this very second, as i type this comment.

Sinai: Israel was forced to give this land back by an international coalition that threatened to send their own military to do it instead, this was the solution to the Suez Crisis and ironically one of the few things the USA and the Soviets actually did together, thwarting the French and British neocolonial aims for Africa.

Now aside from that, you seem to have a different definition of "being attacked", you see I don't view the side that strikes first as "being attacked" but rather "attacking", I know this is a common myth spread by American conservative groups and think tanks like PraugerU, but it's just factually incorrect, just like your assertion about Golan.

[-] S_204@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So you're admitting to redefining terms based on how they benefit you. That you're trying to position Israel being attacked by five different countries at the same time as if Israel's the aggressor really puts a point on your anti-semitism. Israel didn't throw the first punch there, or in the yk war. The record is clear on those fronts.

Israel gave backland in the Golan. They've maintained a position there for their defense which has proven to be necessary and valuable over the past 75 years. That doesn't negate the fact that they gave backland in the Golan. Egypt lost the war. Israel held the land and gave it back. That proves they will give back land in order to move the peace process forward. Your blind Jew hate makes you unable to admit this reality.

You're really working hard to spin facts in an anti-semitic way. You've admitted that you will redefine reality to suit your purposes and you've demonstrated that you have no issues doing it. Different definitions, alternative facts, it's all just lies dude.

All we have here is you lying and spreading propaganda. At least we have you're admitting to it though.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

my god, Israel started the 6-day war, this is a fact, the fucking Israeli government even said it did!

and Israel returned Golan so hard Trump formerly had the US recognize it as Israeli territory, and just like the west bank the Israeli supreme court literally confirmed that it is under belligerent occupation.

You are literally repeating American Conservative propaganda not even Israel agrees with!

[-] S_204@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good gracious, they've been attacked on multiple fronts on a half dozen occasions including the 6 day war. Nasser loaded up the border and rattled his Saber too damn hard giving up his plans. Israel defended itself from being attacked. That's not starting a war, that's responding to your neighbor starting one. That time they were attacked by what? 6 countries? They didn't invade those countries, they pushed the front forward after being attacked. That you'd even attempt to claim they're the aggressor in a 6:1 fight just proves your Jew hate is blinding.

Again, your misinformation is just spreading lies. They returned land in the Golan. That's undeniable. They maintain land for security purposes, that's a necessity as we've seen this week. Conflating that with the West Bank is about as intellectually dishonest as the rest of your attempted propaganda.

I'm repeating history, which is ironic because yet again Israel has been attacked and forced to defend itself.

When they turn Gaza back over to the Egyptians this time, hopefully they can do something positive with it this time. They're going to have a blank canvas.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nasser was literally in the US looking for them to mediate, and the Egyptian military was literally at home because they had no plans to attack.

the reason Israel attacked Egypt was because Egypt signed a defense pact with Jordan, a region the Zionists felt was theirs by divine mandate.

Also "turn Gaza back to the Egyptians"? you don't have a clue of anything related to the Mideast, do you?

[-] S_204@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Every time you respond, you just shift your lie hahaha. What a joke. An Army was sitting on the border, the national leaders said war was imminent. Israel defended itself as it has the right to. Nasser was hardly looking for peace proactively mobilizing troops. That's as laughable as claiming Hamas are freedom fighters rather than terrorists.

Gaza was Egyptian after the Arab Israeli war. It remained under their control for nearly twenty years. That you're unaware of this fact I guess isn't surprising given your lack of education on this topic. It's just endless propaganda from the likes of you people, but you've been indoctrinated so it makes sense you don't have a basis of facts to work from.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
646 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3482 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS