1754
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Can't even seek through songs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AcornCarnage@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

I know not everyone will agree, but I think YouTube premium is the better bang-for-buck service. $3 more per month than Spotify and includes YouTube Music premium and YouTube Premium. So all the music and ad-free YouTube.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 30 points 1 year ago

Except what YT Premium does is easily doable with free tools.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

Only so long as Google decides to continue serving content for free to people who contribute nothing to their bottom line, which isn't guaranteed to last.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Anyone that thinks Google's WebDRM is going to stop with ads is a fool.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Ultimately, there's no real way to get around the fact that operating huge platforms like YouTube that serve hundreds of millions of people every day comes with very significant costs, and someone has to pay them. Either users pay them directly, advertisers pay them in exchange for ad space, or investors pay them in exchange for the ability to control the platform for whatever purpose they want.

Given that, I'm personally pretty happy to settle on direct subscription fees. For the sheer amount of content you get, I don't think it's really that unreasonable, though I am of course speaking as someone in a position where I can afford them.

[-] HKayn@dormi.zone 26 points 1 year ago

*with free tools from thankless efforts.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 25 points 1 year ago

You can donate to projects you like tho

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Preach. I’d rather donate to those folks than give google money lawl

[-] HKayn@dormi.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Are you actually doing that though?

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

I used to. And I will do it again once I have an income where I don't have to count pennies.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Yep! Recently to Yuzu and a mod creator that personally helped me get TotK running at 60FPS with no drops or stutters!

[-] HKayn@dormi.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Are you donating to them?

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

An argument could easily be made for Spotify as well. There are plenty of options for streaming music for free to your device with download support. Just about anything can be done for free if people are willing.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

YT is just the more egregious example of this imo.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Sure, for now. YouTube is cracking down on ad-blockers, don't think they'll let those free tools work forever...

[-] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

YouTube is basically the same price as Spotify in my country (only 12 cents more actually), so even more bang for my buck, specially for family plans.

[-] shectabeni@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Surprising to see any suggestions on here for YouTube Premium. I have been lucky enough to be on a family plan for years and it's honestly great. Sometimes, it's just easier not to deal with having to hack around things to make them usable.

[-] AcornCarnage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Family is one of the biggest reasons. A huge part of it for me was minimizing at least SOME of the ads my kids would be exposed to.

[-] CO_Chewie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I'm currently in a three month trial due to the value (music streaming and ad free you tube), but coming from Pandora YT Music's radio algorithm sucks sooooo bad. One of my first plays was a foo fighters album and now all the stations I create have alt/grunge in them. It's making it really hard to consider staying.

[-] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I did not agree when I had both premium, I did not agree when I had YT light and Spotify premium, and I do not agree today.

Context: I only use YT for its main service; streaming video. I never tried YT music because I already had music streaming set up in a way that worked for me.

[-] AcornCarnage@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, if you are paying for two services but don't use one by choice, sure I can see the value not being there.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
1754 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2394 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS