Signal requiring phone number, thoughts on anonymity? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by aura@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

signal requires a phone number to sign up. a phone number could be used to trace your signal account back to you. so why do people, especially privacy enthusiasts and experts (like edward snowden), still use it and endorse it when it lacks anonymity in that sense? i get that people could use a voip number or something to sign up, but still.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Hazel 17 points 1 year ago

With focus on anonymity matrix is better than signal, with focus on privacy signal is probably better, just because you are forced to use encryption.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023

92 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32465 readers

371 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS