471
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Democrats are standing firm in their refusal to bail out the House Republican majority as it struggles to elect a new speaker 10 days after after booting Rep. Kevin McCarthy.

They're also dialing up the rhetoric against the GOP’s new nominee for speaker, prominent Donald Trump ally Jim Jordan of Ohio, blasting him as an insurrectionist, election denier and extremist.

“House Republicans have selected as their nominee to be the speaker of the people’s House the chairman of the chaos caucus, a defender in a dangerous way of dysfunction, and an extremist extraordinaire,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Friday on the steps of the Capitol, flanked by dozen of Democratic lawmakers. “His focus has been on peddling lies and conspiracy theories and driving division amongst the American people.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

What is the end game here? Continue to trash gop as chaos party as long as possible and then get Jeffries in as minority speaker? Not sure how they will accomplish that...

[-] hibsen@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago

I mean in a less dark timeline the republicans would reject extremism and get their shit together around a normal human being for speaker. That they won’t is neither the democrats’ fault nor the democrats’ job to save them from.

Democrat reps do not exist to elect a Republican speaker.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

The GOP has been dancing with the devil since the 2009+ Tea Party fiasco. The only thing that's changed is the faces and the lengths they've gone to win.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

That they won’t is neither the democrats’ fault nor the democrats’ job to save them from.

Also worth mentioning that reaching across the aisle to elect white supremacists and insurrectionists would not be "saving" the GOP from extremists.

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 49 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What's the alternative? Do nothing and let another bugfuck crazy GQP nutbag run the ~~Senate~~ House?

I'm ok with the Democrats finally finding a spine and making the party of traitors squirm while the whole world sees how fucking stupid and disorganized they are. They made their bed cozying up to the lunatic fringe, and now we get to watch them have some sleepless nights until the donor class lands on them again like they did to McCarthy for the last budget negotiations.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Run the House, not the Senate

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

Derp, I knew that. Thanks for the correction!

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 35 points 2 years ago

The majority party should have no problem electing their own leader. It’s not the Democrats’ place to run the Republican party for them.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

There is no majority party in the House. It might look that way at a glance, since two of the parties operate under the same name, but there are actually three parties in the House right now and none of them have a majority.

The only way to govern in this kind of situation is via a coalition, and as the largest unified party in the House the Democrats should lead that coalition.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

If that were true then the centrist Republicans would help the Democrats elect a Democratic speaker. But they want to pretend their party is two parties when it’s convenient and one party when it’s convenient.

Fuck ‘em. Let them sort out their own mess.

[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago

I think it's mostly to not have Jordan as speaker, since he's a pretty hardcore extremist, and then to make the Republicans look incompetent, at least until they can find another moderate, fail to elect them, find another moderate, fail to elect them, and then make small concessions to elect the first moderate with the help of a few moderate democrats who just want x y z.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

The Democrats end game is to vote for their preferred candidate. The real question is "what is the GOP's end game?" Continue nominating white supremacists and insurrectionists to kowtow to the most extremist bloc of their party, then whining when Democrats don't make up for their inability to whip the necessary votes?

[-] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is that somehow suggesting something you read into my post? Pretty confused here...you think I'm republican? Lol you have no idea how wrong that logical jump would be, no idea

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Force them to propose a moderate willing to make concessions and work across the aisle.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

Do they have any moderates left?

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I don't know, but they certainly have concessions left.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah, but what concessions have they made recently that they actually followed through with?

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

None, which is why Democrats aren't helping them.

Republicans will need to offer concessions that they can't later wiggle out of. Kind of like the concessions McCarthy offered to Gaetz.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

This will determine it. They do have varying levels of extreme.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

The end game is when Republicans realize they cannot elect a Speaker without Democratic votes and offer something meaningful to Democrats in exchange for those votes.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
471 points (100.0% liked)

News

37724 readers
2814 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS