471
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Democrats are standing firm in their refusal to bail out the House Republican majority as it struggles to elect a new speaker 10 days after after booting Rep. Kevin McCarthy.

They're also dialing up the rhetoric against the GOP’s new nominee for speaker, prominent Donald Trump ally Jim Jordan of Ohio, blasting him as an insurrectionist, election denier and extremist.

“House Republicans have selected as their nominee to be the speaker of the people’s House the chairman of the chaos caucus, a defender in a dangerous way of dysfunction, and an extremist extraordinaire,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Friday on the steps of the Capitol, flanked by dozen of Democratic lawmakers. “His focus has been on peddling lies and conspiracy theories and driving division amongst the American people.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

What is the end game here? Continue to trash gop as chaos party as long as possible and then get Jeffries in as minority speaker? Not sure how they will accomplish that...

[-] hibsen@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

I mean in a less dark timeline the republicans would reject extremism and get their shit together around a normal human being for speaker. That they won’t is neither the democrats’ fault nor the democrats’ job to save them from.

Democrat reps do not exist to elect a Republican speaker.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

The GOP has been dancing with the devil since the 2009+ Tea Party fiasco. The only thing that's changed is the faces and the lengths they've gone to win.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

That they won’t is neither the democrats’ fault nor the democrats’ job to save them from.

Also worth mentioning that reaching across the aisle to elect white supremacists and insurrectionists would not be "saving" the GOP from extremists.

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What's the alternative? Do nothing and let another bugfuck crazy GQP nutbag run the ~~Senate~~ House?

I'm ok with the Democrats finally finding a spine and making the party of traitors squirm while the whole world sees how fucking stupid and disorganized they are. They made their bed cozying up to the lunatic fringe, and now we get to watch them have some sleepless nights until the donor class lands on them again like they did to McCarthy for the last budget negotiations.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Run the House, not the Senate

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Derp, I knew that. Thanks for the correction!

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago

The majority party should have no problem electing their own leader. It’s not the Democrats’ place to run the Republican party for them.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

There is no majority party in the House. It might look that way at a glance, since two of the parties operate under the same name, but there are actually three parties in the House right now and none of them have a majority.

The only way to govern in this kind of situation is via a coalition, and as the largest unified party in the House the Democrats should lead that coalition.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

If that were true then the centrist Republicans would help the Democrats elect a Democratic speaker. But they want to pretend their party is two parties when it’s convenient and one party when it’s convenient.

Fuck ‘em. Let them sort out their own mess.

[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

I think it's mostly to not have Jordan as speaker, since he's a pretty hardcore extremist, and then to make the Republicans look incompetent, at least until they can find another moderate, fail to elect them, find another moderate, fail to elect them, and then make small concessions to elect the first moderate with the help of a few moderate democrats who just want x y z.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

The Democrats end game is to vote for their preferred candidate. The real question is "what is the GOP's end game?" Continue nominating white supremacists and insurrectionists to kowtow to the most extremist bloc of their party, then whining when Democrats don't make up for their inability to whip the necessary votes?

[-] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is that somehow suggesting something you read into my post? Pretty confused here...you think I'm republican? Lol you have no idea how wrong that logical jump would be, no idea

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Force them to propose a moderate willing to make concessions and work across the aisle.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Do they have any moderates left?

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I don't know, but they certainly have concessions left.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but what concessions have they made recently that they actually followed through with?

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

None, which is why Democrats aren't helping them.

Republicans will need to offer concessions that they can't later wiggle out of. Kind of like the concessions McCarthy offered to Gaetz.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This will determine it. They do have varying levels of extreme.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The end game is when Republicans realize they cannot elect a Speaker without Democratic votes and offer something meaningful to Democrats in exchange for those votes.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
471 points (100.0% liked)

News

23267 readers
2687 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS