Harvard students scramble to take back support for letter attacking Israel as some CEOs look to blacklist them (nypost.com)

submitted 2 years ago by LWJanniesRCucks@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

you:

I said that the Harvard students supporting Hamas were antisemitic

That statement by them didn't even mention Hamas. Your refusal to look at the Palestinian people as anything but a force to be fought against is disturbing

Quite disappointing to see kbin users attempt to justify a military blockade of people who use every weapon they can get to try to kill your civilians, and try to turn every resource they can get into weapons, is not "an open air prison."

-Guess the KBIN users must be antisemites.

The UN might be a little bit biased here. Maybe.
It's almost like they have a consistent history of appointing antisemites.
There may be a reason Israel doesn't fucking trust them.

-Guess the literal U.N. must be antisemites.

The irony is your trying to go around saying take it easy on a person belligerently calling for people to have their lives ruined while simultaneously justifying the treatment of human beings as something less than. Your right, more disgusting than ironic. The only lesson you're qualified to teach anyone is how not to be a decent human. You seem to have a knack for it.

[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

That statement by them didn't even mention Hamas.

yes, that's why it was antisemitic. Did you read the comment you're replying to? I pointed that out very specifically.

They blamed the violence exclusively on Israel. Do you want to comment on why they didn't blame the violence on the people doing the violence? Do you see why I might have brought that up?

Your refusal to look at the Palestinian people as anything but a force to be fought against is disturbing

The Palestinian people are people who deserve freedom. Your refusal to condemn their real oppressors is disturbing.

-Guess the KBIN users must be antisemites.

I didn't call that user an antisemite, did I?

-Guess the literal U.N. must be antisemites.

Why not include the links I shared? The links that literally explained the antisemitic remarks by those UN officials? Do you not want to see how maybe some of the people accused of antisemitism are maybe actually antisemites?

belligerently calling for people to have their lives ruined

That's not something that happened.

while simultaneously justifying the treatment of human beings as something less than.

that's also not something that happened.

I really hope people here aren't stupid enough to believe your lies.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023

44 points (100.0% liked)

News

36201 readers

3407 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world