Are AI Companies Ripping Off Writers? Canadian Authors Speak Out | The Walrus (thewalrus.ca)

submitted 2 years ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 years ago

. . . Wow. I'm going to be polite and assume that you never took physics in high school, instead of failing the unit on optics. Might want to bone up on that before you make an argument that deals with the physics of lenses, just sayin'.

You don't appear to have much understanding of how the law operates either. It's always complicated and difficult, and judges take a dim view of people who try to twist words around to mean something other than the contract defines them to mean.

[-] Rocket@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I’m going to be polite and assume that you never took physics in high school

Polite would be to explain yourself, not turn to a silly logical fallacy that adds nothing and is in bad faith. Always telling when this happens.

It’s always complicated and difficult

We can make it difficult. It doesn't need to be. Especially when there is nothing new here. We've been reading books into neural networks for 50-plus years. That we've happened to achieved a speed milestone doesn't change anything legally. It isn't that a speed limit was violated.