86
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by mannycalavera@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

Absolutely amazing if this ever happened. Sadly I think this would need a large majority in the commons to get through. Too many "vested interests" will vote against so Labour need to force it through on their own and they can only do that with a majority. Great for headlines though.

As a side note I'm pissing myself at the unintentional sinister paragraph towards the bottom.

The FSB also welcomed Ms Reeves' proposals

Of course it did 😜

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] G4Z@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

This whole plan doesn't mention HS2 or Brexit. (nor housing or the environment for that matter)

'Cutting regulations will unlock £50bn a year in investment, Labour said.' - This is either bullshit or code for fucking over workers.

When it comes to covid fraud, I'm less interested in recovering the cash, and more interested in prosecuting the Tory government that actually enabled, encouraged and participated in this massive fraud.

Overall, utterly pathetic, spineless, lack of leadership.

I can't stand the Tories, but at least Rishi actually had the balls to decide something publicly on HS2, I think it's wrong but at least he decided something.

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 15 points 1 year ago

Sunak has cockblocked HS2 by stating he is selling the land that was bought for it. He will sell it cheaply to his mates who in turn will make a quick profit before Labour take power back. This will make it extremely expensive to take the land back. Sunak is intentionally increasing the cost of anyone trying to resurrect HS2 in the future.

[-] G4Z@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, he's a corrupt Tory prick, of course that's what he's doing.

I'm just annoyed at the total lack of vision from this Labour party. They are shite.

[-] noodle@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

Sunak decided nothing until the absolute last moment possible. Definitely not worthy of praise at all.

[-] buzziebee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ignore this concern troll. Lemmy is full of these anonymous accounts who do nothing but spread FUD about labour. Anyone with their head screwed on wouldn't spend all day bad mouthing and 'bOtH sIdEs' ing labour. Rachel Reeves speech was alright, this policy is nothing but good for the British people, and I'm looking forward to seeing the manifesto closer to the election.

[-] G4Z@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Oh and you have a named account do you?

Maybe you're just some Blairite pro Starmer establishmentist, ever think about that?

[-] G4Z@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Well, I think he decided some time ago and then lied about having made the decision only to then make the decision.

I honestly, despise this lot but nothing Labour is saying is getting me excited, nothing at all.

[-] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

if you recover the money you also review the process and potentially find wrong doing.

that's a great initiative

Starmer is not in government so unable to really make massive decisions. I don't believe we should be applauding Sunak only for being decisive. especially when it's such a terrible decision.

[-] G4Z@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I appreciate that, but an election is coming and I want to know what the policy will be, especially regarding these massive issues.

Also, I want to see people in prison for this fraud, particularly anybody in or related to government.

I've seen enough crackdowns on 'benefit fraud' in my lifetime, it's time for an actual fraud smackdown.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
86 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3076 readers
35 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS