1079
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by zoe@lemm.ee to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SeducingCamel@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago

High reading level shouldn't be elitist, we should strive to have a well educated population

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

It's really weird to call a 7th grade reading level or better elitism in the first place, and calling it "weird elitism" is even worse.

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

should be pretty easy to provide a tangible benefit, then

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Sure: being able to tell the author of the text is lying to you.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago

This point should be front and center when countering the STEM circlejerk of "humanities are useless".

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

The humanities are objectively useful. Grade school reading level as a metric is not.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

Grade school reading level as a metric is not.

What would you suggest instead?

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No idea, but me not offering up an alternative doesn't make it a less useless metric for supporting the conclusions everybody seems to be drawing

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You started this thread by saying

what’s the concrete advantage of the average person reading at a high level is, past some sort of weird elitism?

and now you're trying to point out that grade level isn't a good metric. So is it that reading level doesn't matter at all, or that the metrics we use are flawed? Reductio ad absurdum, is it ok for an entire populace, or at least the vast majority of it, to be illiterate?

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

a useful skill, and one that's not tested in grade school reading level

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The fact that the irony of your answer is lost on you is fucking tragic.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Sorry to say but society works by hierarchies, some people deserve more than others.

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

No they don't.

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

some people deserve more than others

this is also elitism

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

That’s… why I agree with it.

[-] SeducingCamel@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago
[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Because most people are little more than animals, by choice and aren't worth the effort of trying to help.

I'm all for providing for their basic needs, often against their own voting habits and thus their own desires, but expecting some poor redneck to suddenly be valuable as a person is just insane.

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

You don't want a well-educated population for the sake of having a well-educated population. You want it so that you can have a productive population. And clearly, a high reading level isn't required to be a productive member of society since otherwise reading level wouldn't drop over time like this figure is implying.

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
1079 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

12160 readers
568 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS