290
submitted 11 months ago by nebula42@lemmy.world to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 11 months ago

Literally^1^ no one is harmed

^1^and I do mean literally, in the classical sense

[-] FMT99@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago

You just had to footnote your one line comment because of language erosion. Take that as you will.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 11 months ago

You just ~~had~~ chose to footnote your one line comment because of ~~language erosion~~ writer's autonomy

Nice try. Fun fact: Language prescriptivism is at best classist, at worst white nationalist behavior. Take that as you will, and have fun on my blocklist.

[-] FMT99@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Wow that's quite the abrasive response to an off the cuff remark. Have a nice life.

Still it will be hard to break to my mixed race kids that their dad is a secret white nationalist.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 11 months ago

People hate when you say this but you're right, prescriptivism is a fucking disgusting practice and anyone who supports it needs to take a long hard look at the rest of their opinions and why they hold them.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago

Yes, as you know it has been historically used to exclude and marginalize groups of people, and it still is!

[-] bleistift2@feddit.de 39 points 11 months ago

Rules in languages serve the same purpose as standards in engineering. Sure, you don’t have to follow them. And if you want your home’s piping to use 81/13 inch diameters, knock yourself out. But it’s a pain for everyone who will ever be involved with that mess. And a lot of people are involved in your choice of words and grammar.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 11 months ago

You're really comparing language to engineering

STEM brainrot take

[-] bleistift2@feddit.de 38 points 11 months ago

STEM brainrot take

Gotta love a civil discussion.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 11 months ago

I was able to clearly understand your message even though you defied prescriptive conventions by using "gotta"

Gotta love how language evolves. I'm going to fuck up so many conventions today, just you wait and see!

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

THEM: don't make language less expressive

YOU: wow you just used a thing that makes language more expressive CHECKMATE

[-] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

dis opinion bussin blud fr fr ong

[-] Cylusthevirus@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

When it comes to grammar and syntax it makes sense though. Common rules help us understand each other.

Except that we're talking about individual words here. It's not as if we're saying verbs are over now or that all sentences have to be all "Shaka, when the walls fell" or something.

You could have made that point without being rude towards the entirety of the STEM community, but chose not to.

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago

You're in a discussion about language but unable to navigate analogy? Or even just be civil and engage in a respectful manner? Maybe sit this one out.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

They don't though, because my sentence doesn't collapse and kill several dozen people if I don't use the oxford comma

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

you're literally making their point for them by (deliberately) misinterpreting what they meant by "harm" in a way that wouldn't be possible if the language was more expressive

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Not if I cause them harm.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
290 points (100.0% liked)

196

16243 readers
1850 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS