230

Yes, I know that it still exist, and yes, decentralized currency which utilizes distributed, cryptographic validation is not actually a strictly bad idea, but...

Is the speculative investment scam, which crypto substantially represented, finally dead? Can we go back to buying gold bars and Pokemon cards?

I feel like it is, but I'm having a hard time putting my finger on why it lost its sheen. Maybe crypto scammers moved on to selling LLM "prompts?" Maybe the rug just got pulled enough times that everyone lost trust.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BurningnnTree@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

I know one crypto bro IRL. He acknowledges that it's all just a pyramid scheme, but he enjoys it because it's like gambling but with more strategy involved I guess.

[-] nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev 4 points 1 year ago
[-] SoManyChoices@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Is it really though? If I were to go and buy my first ever crypto coin today would you really say the expected value is greater than 0?

I have no doubt those who got in years ago or mine coins using other's resources have an expected value greater than 0 but that's not the entire market. I hope.

[-] nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I guess it depends on your time-frame and your risk profile. BTC/ETH over the medium term has done much better than pretty much any other asset in the world. Altcoins didn't even factor into my brain when I made that comment.

[-] fades@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Would you also consider GameStop’s NFT marketplace for games part of a pyramid scheme?

Or maybe what F1 is doing to evolve how they handling ticketing? Here’s a recent follow up on F1’s NFT ideas I came across recently.

It’s… just not all a pyramid scheme. To say it’s all a pyramid scheme is missing the forest for the trees. It’s n o t

[-] tobyvin@lemmy.tobyvin.dev 2 points 1 year ago

While I think you're right in that neither of those seem to be pyramid scheme, I disagree with the implication that they are any better (apologies if that was not the implication).

They seem to just be creating an avenue for monotization of something that, I assume (but I could be wrong here), was previously free by nature, hence the necessity for an NFT to monetize it.

I guess really that's just what NFTs do, or at least their main use case. But I guess I just fundamentaly disagree with that idea.

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

And because he gets a decent cut of the profits. Coming out ahead (for a while) has a way of assuaging one's worries.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
230 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
416 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS