1317
submitted 1 year ago by Custoslibera@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] InevitableWaffles@midwest.social 105 points 1 year ago

In the marketplace of ideas, rightwing thoughts will be mocked, as they always should been...

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 64 points 1 year ago

Lemmy feels a lot more authentic to real life. If I started talking about tinfoil hat conspiracies, my friends would ridicule me to no end.

As they should.

Same here.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago

If I start talking to random people in a bar odds are I won't meet a single one who will start calling me a Nazi because I believe in the Uyghur genocide...

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 year ago

How is the Uyghur genocide a right wing thing? I'm out of the loop here

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tankies tend to assume any accusation against a Marxist state is either a lie or the victims deserved it.

One of the reasons is that you've got people like the Heritage Foundation running around including Nazis in their "victims of socialism" lists.

Both as the victims and perpetrators btw, lmao.

Mostly though they just seem weirdly stuck in a Cold War mentality.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

Everybody loves jerking off about failed states but leave out how they always have to make it a vacuum while constantly under fire, conspiracy, and embargo by every capitalist state on the planet.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Ok, but how does that change the fact that Lemmy's communists will call you a Nazi for pointing out the genocides perpetrated by those States?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

Go ask the hexbear users!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago

Honestly, this place is full of communists. I’m not the biggest fan of communists, to be frank. There is a lot of backwards ideas that get accepted as “leftist,” when they’re really statist. Particularly revisionist history statist. If a communist party said it, you gotta defend it kinda thing.

[-] InevitableWaffles@midwest.social 32 points 1 year ago

I don't identify as a communist. I just don't want life to be unreasonably difficult for people. Thats it. I just what the promise of what labor was supposed to be. I want it to free us from the shackles of work or die. Guess that is extreme left now even with tankies around the corner from us.

[-] Carvex@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Exactly. We have 50 years of computer driven exponential growth and not a fucking thing is better for us. We don't work less, travel more, be richer, live a better life, or have a better future for the planet. It should make everyone anti-capitalist.

[-] Querk@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

Data I've seen suggests otherwise. Care to engage with me so that we can figure out where the discrepancy lies?

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

You're joking, right? A peasant in the 1200s would work less than a regular person today.

[-] Querk@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

Do you think an average person in 13th century had a better quality of life than an average person living in the 21st century?

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

In many aspects, yes, they did lead a more fulfilling life.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Imma call bullshit on that one lol

And sources for that?

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

For one, the fact their work (which took significantly less time) lead to a real, objective difference and benefit in their society. There's also the fact that anyone not enslaved had partial or complete ownership of their lands. Not to be underestimated, as well, is the fact their society wasn't immediately doomed to collapse from worldwide catastrophes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

This. When I was younger I considered myself pretty centrist, generally people would agree. My views never really changed, but the Overton window has shot so far right I now get called a commie (I guess here I'm a tankie? Still dunno wtf that's about except a slur for 'left of Biden') because I think a 40 hour work week should put a basic roof over your head, whether an efficency on your own or a roomie in a nicer spot.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

(I guess here I’m a tankie? Still dunno wtf that’s about except a slur for ‘left of Biden’)

As far as I can make out, tankies are people who support communist governments even when they go way too far. So even though leaders like Jinping are essentially dictators, because they're ostensibly communist the tankies support them.

At least that's what I've seen from a few weeks on lemmy. I'm sure some tankies will be along to correct me soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rottcodd@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

There is a lot of backwards ideas that get accepted as “leftist,” when they’re really statist.

This is my objection too.

All too many people here don't seem to even begin to understand the inherent threats of institutionalized authority, so in their rush to head off the recreation of the Third Reich, they're basically advocating for the recreation of the Khmer Rouge instead.

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Define 'full of communists'.. cause it sounds like such an american phrase and perspective. To me, it's just a more leftwing centered space. The real communists are a minority. At least on the biggest Lemmy servers.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Go for a walk in Hexbear and Lemmygrad communities, these are Lemmy's communists...

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah but those instances are not nearly as big as lemmyworld and the others. I also didn't say that there were no communists at all. There are just not as many as OP made it out to be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol I’m not crying “SOCIALISM!” because someone recommended taking care of poor people. And maybe it’s just the communities on lemm.ee, maybe it’s because I interact with the communities more because I can’t bite my tongue. But I come across way more communist communities than anything else. Your instance matters. I see a lot of communist communities. As an anarchist, the prevalence of communism on lemmy is troubling to me because I see huge flaws in the thinking and i want to see the left not follow down a doomed hierarchical road that has proven to be a failure over and over and over again.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

i want to see the left not follow down a doomed hierarchical road that has proven to be a failure

Instead you'd want everyone to adopt a system that literally can't possibly work. Genius.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What system do you think they are referring to as an anarchist? Anarchism is simply opposition to hierarchies that allow control over others, such as the control capitalists have over workers by owning the means of production and political forces. The system that anarchists advance in place of that can take an unlimited number of forms.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Anarchism is simply opposition to hierarchies that allow control over others, such as the control capitalists have over workers

Or the control the hierarchical entity (state) must have over a populous to stop thievery and violence. Even in a perfectly idealized world, anarchism only just barely gets to work, teetering on the brink of collapse.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We have a state now though, has thievery and violence been stopped? How many thousands are in poverty, how many are killed in global wars waged in the name of profits? There are states where theft and murder are extremely rare, and states where it is common. What is the difference between the conditions where it is common and uncommon? Is a top-down control and manipulation the only way to reduce violence?

Anarchism works all the time. It's more than a political structure, it's an idea about how to organize relations between people, and there already are many groups that are active that function on anarchist principles.

Any group that collects itself in the modern world as anarchist, like anarchist groups in the Spanish Civil War, are heavily repressed by state forces. Capitalist states work together to discourage anarchist ideals even more so than communism because of the possibility it has for threatening traditional power structures.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the possibility it has for threatening traditional power structures.

You mean the possibility of completely collapsing civilization as a whole.

We have a state now though, has thievery and violence been stopped?

Fallacious reasoning, and pretty obvious at that. I give you a cup of water - some water has been poisoned by heavy metals. If you drink the cup of water, will you get metal poisoning? The only intellectually honest answer is: the question is flawed. The same way it doesn't follow that
Some water is poisoned ⇏ All water is poisoned
It also doesn't follow that
The suppression of violence begets control ⇏ All control suppresses violence.

This is further proven by your following statement

What is the difference between the conditions where it is common and uncommon?

Which opposes your own argumentation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Carvex@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

A heel dragging regressive policy opinion should always be met as such. The world will never go back to the Wild West with gun laws, whites owning everything, women are property etc; to have a political viewpoint desiring these things and feel that it is correct is laughable.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
1317 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

46493 readers
1380 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS