524
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Coach@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

Simple solution: tax the ever-loving fuck out of bullets. $1000 per. Call it a "true cost adjustment."

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 17 points 2 years ago

I wish you the best of luck with that. Poor taxes were the strategy behind the NFA - its incredible unpopularity guarantees it won't make it through either branch of Congress let alone both.

[-] Coach@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago

What a brilliantly uneducated idea. Thanks for turning my hunting season into a 3k dollar minimum adventure instead of a cheap way for me to put food on my table.

[-] Coach@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago
[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

We do during bow season, and then we hunt with rifles during rifle season. It's the best way to get more deer meat in the freezer.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Oh fuck off. No one gives a flying fuck about your bloodlust beyond other psychos.

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago

Ah, I see hunting for food is now bloodlust. Completely rational take.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

It literally is when we live in this day and age. If you aren't living in a tribe somewhere, the bottom line is, you do this because you want to end something's life.

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It literally is when we live in this day and age.

I'll be sure to inform my hunting friends we're all full of bloodlust for our interest in filling the freezer with cheap, quality meat which also serves to provide population control for an invasive and damaging species because a rando on the Internet said so.

I feel for you and your apparent limited ability to consider other situations.

[-] Draupnir@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Says the guy who is vastly unaware of how many responsibly armed citizens they cross paths with on a daily basis, and who have demonstrably prevented mass shootings. You have no idea the hidden safety net you live under and yet you want it destroyed because of the few bad actors.

[-] Coach@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

And just in case you're looking for your "good guys with a gun," they're all standing outside of a school, waiting and shitting their pants. It's pathetic.

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 9 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure anyone - anyone - would argue police are "good guys". If anything, they're an active demonstration that those in power cannot be the only ones with firearms given the extent to which they maliciously misuse that power.

But sure - use the incompetence and cowardice of a given police department as some absurd emotional appeal.

[-] Coach@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Yup. Yes. A few bad actors spoiled it for the rest of you. Waa waa waa...grow up. Y'all can't figure out if guns are a hobby or a necessity, but you seem to always fall back on both points pretty quickly. It's sad that your "interests" seem to threaten our very existence, yet you feel like you have some inalienable right to kill others. It's extremely sad and disappointing. I suggest you grow up and find other ways to entertain yourself.

[-] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago

Waa waa waa…grow up.

Yikes, the projection.

Y’all can’t figure out if guns are a hobby or a necessity, but you seem to always fall back on both points pretty quickly.

Oh? I'm not sure how you interpreted their highlight of the sheer commonality of those legally carrying with no issue as either of these things.

It’s sad that your “interests” seem to threaten our very existence, yet you feel like you have some inalienable right to kill others.

I'm not sure how you feel threatened by the mere existence of inanimate objects. Even extrapolating to the action - that of homicide - I'm not sure how you'd feel threatened by such a thing, especially so disproportionately to its lack of prevalence related to the other ways you can be killed and their statistical likelihood.

I'm also not sure how you interpret the right to bear arms - repeatedly highlighted for self-defense purposes in judgements and judge opinions - as somehow an inalienable right to kill others. Unless I'm missing something, that kill others part tends to result in the offender spending quite some time in prison.

It’s extremely sad and disappointing. I suggest you grow up and find other ways to entertain yourself.

You may wish to take your own advice - you seem unable to think beyond your own preconceived and irrational views on a thing, even aside from your demonstrated inability to consider how your criticisms and suggestions might apply to yourself rather hypocritically.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

None, because I don't live in a shithole where you need guns in order to feel safe in your own home.

[-] BaldProphet@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Ah yes, let's just arbitrarily throw out the Bill of Rights and make it so that only rich people can access tools with which to protect themselves.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
524 points (100.0% liked)

News

31384 readers
2272 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS