469

Starfields is one of the biggest games of 2023 – but it’s joined other recent games like Baldurs Gate 3 in being boycotted by conservatives because of the way it interacts with gender.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Reminder that every decade, conservatives whined about something fucking stupid.

2020s. Pronouns. Trans. Blue hair?

2010s. Gay marriage.

2000s. Gay representation on TV.

90s. Video games. Rap music.

80s. D&D. Gay people existing.

70s. Rock music. And interracial marriage?

60s. Hippy culture. Being antiwar.

50s. Fucking hips shaking on TV?

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 29 points 2 years ago

You forgot "children being taught evolution", that was a pretty big one. Also birth control pills, which many of them are still fuming over.

You can also keep going back to when they were insisting radio would rot children's brains or even further back to when they opposed electrification.

But at least electricity can kill you. Modern reactionaries take entitled whining to a whole new level, growing physically violent because there's people out there who are unhappy with the genitals they were born with.

I guess we'll never understand the horror of having an extra checkbox in a character creator that they have to look at (but not click, since it's already what they want by default).

Anyway, fuck em. They can either accept that society is going to treat minorities with basic human decency or they can stare at the wall for 8 hours a day waiting for new far-right approved content. It's their live to piss away.

Scopes has entered the chat

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

every decade conservatives whined about something

And by the following decade they had been proven to be not just wrong, but actively impeding basic human decency

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Conservatives have been on the wrong side of every major societal improvement, every major argument, on every major thing.

[-] WaterChi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

On a long enough time frame ... we win. Every time.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Not only do we win every time, but the people who fought us will pretend they were always on our side when we do.

[-] WaterChi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Beau of the Fifth column on YouTube has an interesting viewpoint. Today's conservatives are yesterday's progressives who refused to change over time. People don't get more conservative as they age ... the Overton window shifts left and leaves them behind.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

the Overton window shifts

That's how you end up with Bill Maher, who prides himself on his liberal bona fides, is sure that the changes he fought for needed to happen but also that this new generation just goes too far, and completely fails to see that the people he fought against in the 60s and 70s followed the same process as him and ended up in the same place as him.

[-] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 years ago

As someone who just turned 43, I find this quite interesting and relatable.

I mean, if anything I'm getting actively more leftist as I get older, but I do find myself nonplussed when it comes to gender identity and such. Not to the point where I'm against it, obviously, but I do have to work harder to try to understand people who aren't in my immediate field of experience. If I was less invested in trying then I can imagine that I'd end up being one of those grumpy old pricks who used to be with it before they changed what it was. But ultimately the attitude I take is that how younger people want to present themselves to the world has absolutely fuck all to do with me, and as long as they're trying to make themselves happy then all power to them.

On an entirely different level, it's like bitching that all modern pop music sucks. The music doesn't (generally) suck, you're just not the target any more.

People don't get more conservative as they age ... the Overton window shifts left and leaves them behind.

aka "Cant wait until you're dead".

[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

The moral arc of the universe is long but it bends towards justice.

[-] loutr@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Religion thrives the most when people are ashamed of what they like.

[-] Dick_Justice@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe swap "gay people existing" for "gay people dying in droves while the government ignored it"

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
469 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30908 readers
1634 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS