772
        you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
    
  
  
    view the rest of the comments
        this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
        
  
      
  
      772 points (100.0% liked)
      World News
    38121 readers
  
      
      674 users here now
  
      News from around the world!
Rules:
- 
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc 
- 
No NSFW content 
- 
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc 
        founded 6 years ago
      
  
  
      MODERATORS
      
  
    
@trias10
I get that. It makes logical sense. It's just that corporations have so much power to impose their will and it feels weird to me that we let them do that even when it comes to how a human presents themself.
I agree with you about that, but these employees have chosen to do a job where they come face to face with customers daily, and some of those customers may get offended by seeing an employee wearing a BLM badge, in red states for example. The company doesn't want to antagonise a potential customer and lose a sale, so they're asking that no employees wear any political markings. And honestly, I think that's a fair request if you work in a customer-facing role.
Notice that this ruling only applies to Whole Foods workers, not Amazon warehouse workers, who can probably wear whatever they want since they don't deal with customers.
Because it is weird. It's even weirder for any average person to defend it.