253
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Rinna@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] saigot@lemmy.ca 83 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I played like 40hours of Cyberpunk 2077 before going on social media. I Thought it was going to get "mid" reviews, but I guess I got really lucky to not hit any serious bugs. Lesson being: If you wanna enjoy a game, don't look at any marketing materials, and don't seek out social media about it until you've had time to form your own opinions.

[-] weew@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I read reviews before buying on day 2, basically. Sure, I expected some bugs, as the reviewers warned. I barely got any, just some visual glitches during cutscenes. Still, I would give the game a solid 8/10.

Came out of my playthrough to everyone raging about everything about the game. Couldn't even give an honest opinion about the game without being downvoted to oblivion because people who never even played the game refused to believe the game was playable at all.

[-] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago

The hype backlash was a serious issue for that game. People expected it to be something it never could have been.

[-] Lith@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

It would be one thing if people were just overhyping things, but a lot of the outrage was over how much they just blatantly lied while marketing the game. They promised a lot of specific things and then released something that was aesthetically impressive but ultimately outdone in just about every other category by sometimes decades old games, and lacked all of the groundbreaking features they marketed.

Personally, even coming back to it much later and trying to enjoy it at face value with all of its updates, it still felt like a boring and shallow GTA clone with a neon glaze. That's not to mention the fact that it's still frustratingly buggy.

[-] saigot@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think the same thing is happening with starfield as well. People expected skyrim x elite dangerous x the good parts of no man's sky and I think that just isn't realistic. That said I find starfield pretty meh in it's current state, I am waiting for the QOL mods to stabilize before I play much as I just ran into way too many issues.

[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I've seen a lot of people complain that "It's just fallout in space." And I'm just wondering what the hell they were expecting.

[-] mortrek@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

My biggest (not only) complaint so far is that entire planets have maybe 8 or 9 species of plants and animals. Hopefully biodiversity mods will pop up. It seems like a decent platform to build future content into.

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Might be because they marketed it as such and then the devs failed to live up to the marketing.

I still laugh thinking about how it ran "surprisingly well" on PS4. Lmao

[-] averagedrunk@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Same. I played it on stadia and it was pretty stable. When I went to that other site to see what people were saying I was absolutely shocked at the amount of bugs and hate it was getting.

[-] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I played it on Stadia, completed it within like two months after the release, never encountered any bug

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be it was truly bad, but not in a rage-y way, only in a "Wow, this is it?! All this hype, all this wait, and this tepid fart is all we're getting at the end?"-way.

I finished it - which granted isn't difficult given how brief the main quest is - then went through some specific side quests. I will give it credit, some of the side quests have really cool characters and are overall really well done. And the graphics can be pretty as hell in some if not most areas. But ~everything else, the main quest, the writing, the story, the city in itself, the software quality, the combat system, the upgrade system, it's all there, it's largely functional, but just barely so.

So yeah, just massively disappointing given how much work must have been behind it. I don't even want to know how often management yanked the team around and made them re-do massive parts of it, the bugginess and tonal disjointedness of the finished game hints at it plenty.

Special shoutout to the driving, which highlights how the game was clearly not meant to have this until relatively late in development.

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I borrowed it from a library for a PS4. It was genuinely unplayable if you actually wanted to play it, but for laughing at the bugs and whatnot it was great.

Would've been pissed if I had paid anything for it.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
253 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44149 readers
1277 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS