176

Russia says there's a problem with billions of rupees it has in India that need to be converted (markets.businessinsider.com)

submitted 1 year ago by zabadoh@lemmy.ml to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Key quotes:

Russia has accumulated billions of rupees that are sitting in Indian banks.

Reuters reported that Russia and India have suspended negotiations over using rupees for trade between the two countries.

Russia prefers to be paid in Chinese yuan, which has become the most-used foreign currency in Russia.

Russia and India remain deadlocked in a currency dispute that has also frozen weapons sales between the two countries.

India won't pay Russia in US dollars over concerns that it may face secondary sanctions and won't pay in rubles because of worries about obtaining Russia's currency on global markets at a fair rate,

Recently, (Russia) agreed to use the (Chinese) yuan to for payments on a nuclear-power plant deal with Bangladesh, after previously insisting on using its ruble.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] rammer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

In Putin's Russia bad idea execute you

FTFY

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Legit question: is Putin's Russia actually worse than Soviet in terms of the disappearing and defenestration and shit?

[-] Ulara@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Putin's Russia is more gentle on its own population, but it is potentially more dangerous internationally. Soviet Union more or less abided by the rules of international order, contributed to the demise of old-world imperialism, and almost never issued nuclear threats. Putin's Russia is an outright bandit state, openly ignoring any international rules and conducting acts of terror - like the Islamic State. If not stopped now, it can start in the future a devastating world war without any remorse.

[-] 73ms@infosec.exchange 2 points 1 year ago

@Ulara @cheese_greater Not really sure it is true that it is more gentle on its own population as a blanket statement. That would depend on the era we are talking about. Stalin certainly was worse but Gorbachev wasn't.

@ukraine

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That guy had some balls, holy shit.

[-] Ulara@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, the Gorbachev era was a golden time of unheard of freedom and international cooperation. You could observe how people joyfully opened up to new opportunities.