621
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And even if all those tankers were partially owned by US companies,

If the tankers or company is operating in the US, then they are bound by US laws no matter where they are in the world. A company can't benefit from the protection of the US government and laws at home only to go abroad to commit US crimes.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Many countries can use that justification. Why are you defending an act that you’d condemn if it was done to America?

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

You're really committed to the act, even after multiple people have pointed out your error in reading this situation. Kudos to you I guess?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It’s not an act. I care about this world I live in. I don’t debate to convince the people that disagree with me. I do it to show that those people don’t use logic and reason to decide their beliefs. They want the illusion of confirmation bias. I try to disrupt that illusion. We need to see the world from different perspectives.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago

I hate that "confirmation bias" have become moo words with people nowadays.

The logic is pretty sound:

  • A company that does business in the United States must comply with American laws.
  • It is forbidden under American law for a company that operates from the United States to do business with Iran.
  • The company, through its child, shipped oil from Iran.
  • American authorities, enforcing American law, ordered the company to divert the ship and turn over the oil for confiscation because the shipment was illegal.
  • Oil is confiscated.

I remark that sanctions do not require the approval of the United Nations. Under customary international law, it is an application of sovereign authority. Any country can apply sanctions and can do so in any way you like. What the USA has said is that "if you want to do business here, we forbid you from doing business with Iran".

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I appreciate you going the distance with that guy. I don't think they changed their mind, nor do I think they have the capacity to. You certainly kept it on level for us in the peanut gallery though. Cheers!

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You owe me $250 million for using the word “moo.” I sanctioned you 5 hours ago, without your knowledge or approval. You have to do what I want, because I have a bigger stick. I can make up whatever law or sanction I want, and you have to follow it or I’ll destroy your town. Pretzel logic. Call it confirmation bias or sucking your own dick, but that’s what is going on.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

I wasn't aware that you were a sovereign state or that I had any money deposited in your banks or that I do business of any sort with you.

You can sanction me by putting a permanent embargo on conversing with me by blocking me if you want

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It was an analogy. I don’t want to block you. I want to have an intelligent discussion about the merits of this act. But people just want to defend America despite its despotic acts. It makes me sad.

[-] legion02@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The analogy is closer to you getting banned by a lemmy instance for breaking their rules when replying to comments from another instance. Just because you're abroad doesn't mean you're ungoverned.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There is no governance between states.

International law (also known as public international law and the law of nations) is the set of guidelines, norms, and standards usually forming the default behavior between states. Inter means between thus outside of territories thus absent of sovereignty, thus isn't a law at all (See: Westphalian System) and is rather a common-practice between states - unless they wish otherwise due to their own reasoning. (Source](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law).

[-] legion02@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This isn't an action between states. A US based company bought oil from Iran (hence why it's Iranian oil, they're referencing origin, not ownership) to sell to China. That us based company was found to be in violation of US sanctions against Iran. They capitulated because they still wish to do business in the US.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Do you logic bro?

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Wow you suddenly got so juvenile lmao

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Trying to relate to the audience.

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Logic - US said do not do that.

Reason - They did it.

If this has insulin, guns, food. You'd probably not care at all. This article would never be written.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[-] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Downvoters believe that America is indeed god. That is how far America's dick is down their throat.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It’s difficult when you first begin to realize that what you’ve been told is the truth your whole life is lie. It happened to me with the Iraq war and the PNAC report. I try to remain compassionate, because, as an American, I’ve been there. The truth sucks. It’s easier to believe the lies.

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 year ago

China tried to run illegal police stations in numerous countries.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And that has nothing to do with this story.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Neither does anything that you're arguing about.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
621 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38600 readers
2741 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS