207
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
207 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
60042 readers
3182 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I still have to disagree. There was no reason for them to develop lightning in the first place. It has 0 advantages over technology already available at the time, and their adapters use the technology they're trying to upsell anyways- USB.
As for the last subjective part of your statement: "The Apple Community forums are full of people posting stories about their broken cables, and it appears to be one of the most common issues that Apple users are facing."
Edit: I wish I could find a conclusive source for lightning vs micro-usb charging speed in 2012, it has proven difficult. This article suggests an extremely negligible 0.3A difference that effectively did nothing because all phone batteries at the time had a 1A charging maximum https://www.gearmo.com/things-to-know-about-lightning-cables/
Lightning cables had, and have, substantial advantages over micro-USB:
I'll preface this by admitting I misspoke. Lightning did develop into a better technology once the power delivery got better and I forgot they desperately needed the slightly higher PD for the 4th gen iPad. I also completely forgot about the logical data layers afforded by the extra pins because it's such a strange niche to need direct output for your phone rather than just moving the files to a computer. However, this still doesn't explain why they wouldn't just switch to USB-C when it was released and proven to serve all these functions, and I take issue with every other point you made.
I would love conclusive, hard data on this but this has been spread everywhere and it's completely anecdotal. I've seen the "40K to 10K" comparisons but the 40K mating cycles minimum is attributed to the lightning port while the 10K mating cycles minimum is attributed to the micro usb/usb-c cable.
Really?
Apple's very own branded lightning cables are terrible quality. I don't see why you wouldn't hold a first-party manufacturer accountable for their low quality standard and then turn around and point to a low standard for third-party manufacturers.