201

A draft law sparks debate with locals calling it excessive and questioning how it would be enforced.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

What is the difference between this and what the french do?

The french have banned all religious iconography from educational institutions. Simple separation of church and state. This is different, and it's kind of obvious.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

Isn’t it kind of strange that French schools didn’t have a problem with religious iconography until recently?

It was introduced in 2004, so you may be right. This may be a case of "brown people bad".

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There isn't, both are plain old systemic oppression (generally mostly misogyny and/or queerphobia) disguised as "concern for the population", there to control and further marginalise.

(though, of course, fans of both China and France and/or haters of women, queers, and/or Muslims, would die on this hill trying to convince themselves otherwise)

[-] nestEggParrot@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

One is enforced countrywide under a vague law open for interpretation.

Other is for school children on school premises, clearly stating the articles of clothing not allowed.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
201 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32586 readers
454 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS