153

I recommend this video to look more into OSR philosophy regarding the rules: https://www.youtube.com/live/bCxZ3TivVUM?si=aZ-y2U_AVjn9a6Ua

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nerorero 21 points 1 year ago

Lmao, I think you confused pf1 and pf2. In pf1 you can build yourself into a corner and create useless characters with ease. In 2e the worst characters are still decent

[-] Dice@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

Nope, I know both. They both suck because of the required over optimization. But pf1 at least didn't have characters constantly at full hp, which is one of the biggest balance issues.

[-] Nerorero 18 points 1 year ago

??? Have you ever played 2e? That shit is perfectly balanced. Just because fights are designed around having full hp doesn't mean the players always are.

In pf1 you can ruin a character with an uninformed choice, in pf2 you can't. The gap between minmaxxed or not has become reasonable in my opinion.

[-] Skabb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You definitely can screw yourself a lot with uninformed choices, but they are less impactful per choice, and the base kit of classes are good enough that bad feat picks won't make you useless.

The biggest exception here is spell selection, shit spell selection can feel really bad, and there are a decent amount of "trap" spells (not that the spells are bad, but it's easy to misunderstand the intended purpose).

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
153 points (100.0% liked)

RPGMemes

10304 readers
224 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS