1354
Google Chrome pushes ahead with targeted ads based on your browser history
(www.theregister.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1354 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
76544 readers
2642 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
These sneaky foxes should be fired.
EDIT: it seems nobody wants to fire a fox. That almost drives me to the edge but I guess I'll just try to be brave and think of it as a safari.
How is it sneaky? They're very public about it, and the popup I got was opt-in, and clear about what would be shared if I agreed.
It's opt-in...for now. It will probably be mandatory to use the browser in the near future.
Yeah, it doesn't sound like "opt-in" as much as it actively prompts users. Opt-in would be it's accessible in the settings but not pushed in your face.
It's opt-in for not because they're testing how tolerant users are. They'll start bending you over soon enough.
So if it's opt-in, how is it sneaky?
Bcs the opt-in is called enhanced ad privacy ...
And also bcs the opt-in is only the first stage when there are articles about the change, in a few months it will be opt-out (and called opt out of enhanced privacy which will also be a lie).
I'm just saying it's opt-in, which it definitely is. It's not "sneaky" if it's literally clearly out in the open. They're not "lying" and they are conforming to EU law which is quite strict on this topic.
You are choosing to accept their terms of service, and if you don't like them, just use a different browser??
How is this not sneaky/intentionally misleading?
If you say "no, I do not want Enhanced Ad Privacy" then they won't track you.
If you say "yes, I want the Enhanced Ad Privacy" then they will track you.
(*track you in the sense of what's discussed here, the local browsing history)
I'm sure EU will consider this as not compliant.
And no, I never used Chrome.
And also no, monopolies should not be able to fully dictate their own ToS.
I disagree in that it's misleading. But how dafuq du they have a monopoly on web browsers? That's just stupid
Oh ffs, take my upvote, but know that I'm not happy my brainhole had to endure such punnery
Only after the ~~narwhal bacons at midnight~~ memmy mlem's on a lunar photon voyage.