340
submitted 1 year ago by PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] uriel238 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, and the society that Superman lives in is one that is inherently good and functional, and just needs to be groomed once in a while (or defended from exterior elements).

Granted, they tried to get Superman to force nuclear disarmament, and that didn't go so well.

Superman is actually the zenith example of defenders of the status quo. Superman's job is to return things back to normal which IRL we can no longer pretend is acceptable.

[-] Silverstrings 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think every piece of media has to promote revolutionary politics in order to justify its existence.

[-] uriel238 1 points 1 year ago

Well, this was a point that was even made in Superman 1978, in which culture was recognizing the modern age as becoming too corrupt and complicated for a simple superhero. It's still possible to enjoy it, but the Superman narrative, in failing to keep up with the times loses its relevance. That's okay. People still like swashbucklers too.

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
340 points (100.0% liked)

196

16597 readers
2057 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS