• There will be 3: NSFW, CW and Generic. Excuse the passive aggressiveness but this tells me you didn't read the RFC at all

I thought it was obvious that generic is even broder than nsfw or cw, and is irrelevant since we're talking about nsfw type not being specific enough. And your writing isn't passive aggressive, it sounds angry. If you didn't want comments why name it request for comment?

Your example makes no sense as people not wanting to see will block the entire NSFW tag type in the settings,

Your rfc doesn't mention that, it only mentions blocking tags.

This is what your outlook section says:

There have already been several discussions about future expansions, in particular filtering tags has been requested. Given this proposal tag filtering in the feed view should be possible without further changes to the backend.

Do you see tag type filtering anywhere?

Preset tags can and will definitely be included... What you are describing here is pretty much what I wrote in the RFC

You wrote of only having the nsfw and cw (and general) types in the rfc. I didn't see anything about expanding that to more specific types. And if you mean having an nsfw tag with the name porn, it's not clear in the rfc that tag names can be used for filtering.

Using the object ID optional tag federation can also be achieved, allowing for communities across multiple instances to share content via tags

Makes it sound like only tags with the same id would be considered the same in the interface, so the same preset tag from different instances/communities would not be interchangeable.

See my point regarding NSFW filtering,

If your point was:

Theoretically NSFW could be implemented using a preset "Content Warning" tag but seperating out this tag allows instances to better filter it out for moderation purposes

Then your point is that it does make sense to have more tag types if they're important enough, so that's not a point against having a spoiler tag type. Anyways, I wrote that because I thought every post would be limited to 1 tag like on reddit and didn't see the news example. Mb.

You are almost literally describing my RFC, i ask again did you actually read it?!

Stop being so flippant about it. I read your post. It talks about a single tag system that also takes the role of content warnings. I specifically wrote that (imo) content warnings (for filtering out) should be seperate than tags (for filtering in). Also your post doesn't mention platform wide default tags.