Battle is not a card type! (media.wizards.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Gootsteen@feddit.nl to c/mtg@mtgzone.com

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

According to comprehensive rule 300.1 (page 56 of the linked pdf), the card types are: "artifact, conspiracy, creature, dungeon, enchantment, instant, land, phenomenon, plane, planeswalker, scheme, sorcery, tribal, and vanguard."

Notably, battle is missing from that list. Probably just an error, but does this have implications for tournament play?

Can we think of any funny interactions because of this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 5 points 1 year ago

Some cards ask for a card "of a type not already chosen" or similar, so if Battle isn't a card type, it wouldn't be a valid target.

Others might ask for a nonartifact, nonland etc card, and Battles would be valid, as they should.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Worth noting as well, but even if you ignored the "Battle" type on the permanent, it is already possible and well within the bounds of the rules to have a permanent with no types (for example, mutate on top of a Theros god and lose the required devotion).

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023

12 points (100.0% liked)

MTG

1908 readers

1 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

andrew@mtgzone.com

mike@mtgzone.com