2006
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago

Nothing! That's why I framed my reply as a factual statement, rather than a personal attack.

[-] thebrownhaze@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Wow. The first person on this thread to not just insult me.

I have no issue with free school meals, I just don't want them to be universal, feeding rich kids is crazy.

[-] Astronautical@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago

It's easier for everyone to have free meals than a select few, I feel. It would also get rid of an easy target on lower income kids being bullied for having the "free lunch".

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Probably also much cheaper per. Trying to set up a meals program for the fee underprivileged - probably should just order Panera delivered. But if you go through the overhead of setting up a program, the cost of more meals is probably marginal.

Also, how about when kids forget. Why does it always seem to be the teacher who has to buy emergency food?

To me, it’s like prison: kids always compare school to prison, so let’s go with that. The government is forcing them to be there past meal times, and not letting them out. The school is claiming parental authority to watch out for their needs. One of them is food, dammit

[-] thebrownhaze@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, the government is wasteful and bureaucratic I agree. Is my solution anyone can have the free meals if they apply for it they're simple to apply for through the school.

That would immediately eliminate a huge number of unnecessary lunches to purchase. I would happily have been buying my kids their school lunches through their first three years of school, but that was not a choice offered to me.

When I went to school half the kids are on preschool dinners literally nobody cared.

Incidentally my family were dirt poor when I was a little but we weren't poor enough to qualify for free school lunches but we may do with sandwiches. Presuming the poor are incapable and requiring of constant charity is the soft bigotry of low expectation

[-] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Presuming the poor are a monolith is problematic. There's also a huge difference between being broke and being broke in a poverty-defined culture. There are folks who are broke and still have a big view of the world, and folks who are broke and have a very narrow view of a very small world. That said, I don't understand the hostility to a hand out.

[-] thebrownhaze@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

In case you didn see my reply to the guy below 👇 it addresses some of your points too

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
2006 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

11145 readers
1443 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS