251
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Let's read the article and look the causes:

"With the rising cost of living, I don't think people feel they can afford to, or comfortably say they want to, have children," said 23-year-old Anna Tanaka.

In 2020, women got married for the first time at an average age of 29.4, or 3.9 years later than in 1985, government data shows.

As people have fewer children, they are able to spend more on each child than families have in the past. That drives up the average cost of raising a child for the broader population

Tuition at private universities jumped fivefold between 1975 and 2021, and by 19 times at public universities, data shows.

These are all symptoms of capitalism. Alienation and seeking "class mobility" leads to people getting married later. The cost of living is a capitalist construct, and it rises primarily due to seeking profit. Colleges are also seeking to profit, and have successfully convinced people that taking debt early in life is good for individuals going into the labor pool. The debt also increases alienation and people who would have children are suddenly priced out of it due to education debt.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's hilarious to me that you linked this as somehow a result of capitalism

In 2020, women got married for the first time at an average age of 29.4, or 3.9 years later than in 1985, government data shows.

As people have fewer children, they are able to spend more on each child than families have in the past. That drives up the average cost of raising a child for the broader population

I mean the whole post is silly but this part especially is just chef's kiss as a response to the poster above.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I explained how they were symptoms of capitalism. If you can't understand it, then maybe you need a deeper understanding of the topic. How doesn't it make sense?

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Having fewer children means you spend more on the fewer children, driving up average cost of raising children

We have one President indicted 91 times so on average Presidents are indicted twice because we've had 46 of them.

This is just how math works, and has nothing to do with any economic system

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"average cost" can vary in meaning on this topic. I read it as "fewer people are buying goods necessary for children, leading to raised prices and a higher average cost of raising children". Considering studies done on the cost of raising children, this is how I interpreted the quote. But your interpretation is also technically correct, and I won't fault you for reading something differently than I did.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's the incorrect way to read this. Rather, people are spending more on their children, and people without children are seeing average cost of raising children.

Effectively, the standard of living for children is going up and people who feel they cannot hit that standard of living are (in Japan's case especially) opting not to have them.

I assure you that poor people are still having children that survive.

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
251 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2083 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS