507
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
507 points (100.0% liked)
Selfhosted
39905 readers
294 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Someone is trying really hard to hurt Lemmy by continually attacking the most popular instance. Is this all coming from right-wingers upset that their nazi instances were defederated across basically the whole fediverse?
The simplest explanation is 4chan types just doing it for the lulz.
Could be, I'm surprised /g/ didn't create an instance
Their knowledge stops at creating sway screenshots.
I'm sure someone's already created a logo. But, that's as far as they ever get.
My tin foil hat is telling me it’s one of the other social media companies funding a hacking group to do it. They stand to have the most to lose, and they’ve seemingly decided to enjoy changing the narrative regarding multiple topics. Lemmy stands directly against what the bigger social medias stand for.
I have no evidence to back this though. As a business owner I just know that things become very consistent when people are being paid, and very inconsistent when they aren’t. These attacks are seemingly very consistent/organized.
You think a company that is posed to go public is going to attack a competitor with a minuscule amount of traffic with extremely illegal material that could put them in prison for even having?
Reddit? No. I was thinking moreso Meta. They have the deeper pockets and a proven track record of breaking privacy laws to their own benefit.
That’s even worse. Meta probably doesn’t even know what Lemmy is.
So then why was Meta trying to get Threads to be on the Fediverse? Of course they're aware of any potential threats, no matter how small.
Why reinvent the wheel if someone’s just going to hand you the backend? Lemmy is no threat to them.
The threat is a new sustainable community that's sheltered from advertising that people could leave Factbook/Instagram/whatever and go to.
Meta was talking about adding Mastodon federation to their Threads app. So I very much doubt it.
They'd probably take an Embrace, Expand, Extinguish approach.
See, I don’t believe this was done by a large corp. But all the DDoSing that’s happened? I can see u/spez orchestrating that.
Lemmy isn’t a threat to Reddit. It’s the same old trolls doing it like every other time.
I don’t think they do see it as a threat, I just think spez is petty enough and juvenile enough to do it.
it’s this https://amp.knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-feel-bad-for-you-i-dont-think-about-you-at-all
Like, again, I pretty solely think it’s spez’s own personal ego shit. For example, he could have just shutdown the API. Instead, he had a weeks-long meltdown including committing libel against a developer. Someone like Zuckerberg doing this doesn’t make any sense to me, but I can totally see spez being exactly that kind of petty.
He’s have to acknowledge Lemmy being a threat, which it’s not, and which his ego won’t allow anyway. The simplest answer is the best.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
agree to disagree?
You would pay a third party to do it. And keep details extremely vague so you have plausible deniability.
Just No, it’s nonsense.
There must be room under that tinfoil hat for the both of us, because this was my first thought too.
The longer it continues, the more likely that scenario is IMO. Bitter alt-right extremists would probably start losing interest after a short while, whereas social media competitors would stand to gain from long-term interference.
Come on in! There’s cookies.
You have a massively inflated view of Lemmy's importance in the social media market.
I'd go with state actors first.
When a particular social media platform is centralized, you can buy yourself a say percentage of stock and have sway over it (cough tencent), or have a useful idiot ruin the platform (cough musk), or another useful idiot to run propaganda you like anyway (cough truth social, cough fox news, cough newsmax...), or yet another that will sell out it's host country's citizens for cold hard cash (cough facebook).
But when that social media platform is decentralized? Well, then you'd need to figure out how to poison the well early on to stave off adoption. The Saudi Arabias, UAEs, Chinas definitely don't like the idea of lemmy, and it'll be way harder for them to control if critical mass is hit.
Yep, that’s a great point.
Add to that the fact that mainstream social media companies wouldn’t touch DDoS and CSAM attacks with a 100-foot pole, even if they contracted with a third party. Both of these attacks are highly illegal and would surely ruin a publicly traded company (or one that’s trying to go public, like Reddit).
And don’t forget Russia in your list of state actors who are threatened by the unrestricted flow of information. They definitely don’t want their citizenry to be informed of how disastrously their invasion of Ukraine is going, or what a murderous scumbag Putin is.
I wouldn't put it past the hexbear crazies throwing a tantrum. They claim to be left wing... Sure seem more like fascist trumper types though. Maybe it's just that they're all incels and incels all seem about the same.
Downvote from me there. I’ve seen plenty of examples of hexbear people being nice, interesting and good sports. They definitely seem to have more of shitposting culture than is normal on mainstream lemmy. But all in all it’s seemed fun to me from what I’ve seen.
Beyond all that, this is just superficial and prejudicial. If you had some examples to link to or more substantial insights to share as to why it’d be “them”, that’d be worth reading.
Otherwise, they’re an instance. Not one person, I’m sure some on hexbear are assholes and some awesome.
So, so shocked someone it's from lemmygrad that is defending the notoriously toxic "communist" tanky trollfest instance.
Sorry, not from lemmygrad. And I'm on lemmy.ml because I joined before the Reddit migration and "Privacy and FOSS" (the focus of lemmy.ml) made a lot of sense for a lemmy instance/community.
Beyond that ... more superficial, prejudicial hate mongering without any description of why or for what purpose. Sorry, I don't think it's worth reading ... a downvote from me ... and, just being real for a moment ... at the moment it's more likely that you're a member of a "notoriously toxic ... trollfest".
Ironically, IME, I've seen significantly more troll-like tankie hate than I do tankie-trolling. I keep asking for receipts/links to tankie trolling here, as I'm genuinely curious to see it and understand what people are so upset about (please don't explain to me what's so upsetting unless it's culturally thorough or coupled with some links+descriptions) ... but no one has been able to do so.
Most people from hexbear provide sources, which is better than can be said for all the tankie hate.
lemmy.ml =/= lemmygrad.ml
Throwing a tantrum about what exactly? They're one of the oldest-running Lemmy instances. Until now they were running a fork based on a pre-Federation version of the codebase.
You believe they did a bunch of work migrating their database only to then negate that work by destroying the community they wanted to Federate with?
At least a handful of users on hexbear had made their intention clear during the first week of re-federation, they were looking to cause chaos on Lemmy for there own pleasure. I don't know if they were banned and/or their comments deleted.
Well something to keep in mind is that hexbear isn't one person ... it's a whole community that's developed independently for a while. So it's reasonable to expect that there'd be variation in the behaviours of members in the same way there's variation on the rest of lemmy. From what I've gathered, not all hexbear members are keen on the re-federation, and some aren't too keen on being "well-behaved" around politically opposed users (ie "libs"), though hexbear admins and other users have promised moderation and that such isn't part of the core hexbear values.
It's social media, afterall ... and people can be rather shit and ruin it for the rest of us. In the end, the core service provided a social media platform isn't the hardware, sys-admin-work or software (however necessary they are) ... it's the moderation work.
The moderation keeps the place sanitary enough for people to actually want to be here ... however much we may have problems with particular actions of our moderators, we should really support and praise them at every turn.
Big difference between a few users who did a bunch of work and the toxic goonsquad the majority of the userbase turned into.
Considering all the alt-right garbage that was popping up there the last couple of days this seems at least plausible. I sometimes envy their ability to utterly destroy anything they touch.
I'm sure you'd love to link to some examples
See people claim this constantly with no proof
You want me to link posts that the mods removed? That seems like an unrealistic expectation. You could always check the post pinned to the top of lemmyshitpost where they describe the recent problems, but I suspect you didn’t ask for proof in good faith
Ah that's actually my bad, I thought you were replying to a different comment in reference to hexbear
This makes the most sense to me. It's a pretty vitriolic attack, therefore I don't think it's simply a troll while at the same time I don't believe it's any corporate social media.