[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Financial planner here. Deflation is bad for “everybody” that wants to talk to you about it. It’s bad for financial planners because it makes the stock market go down, so we make less money. It’s bad for politicians because everybody that votes seems to think the economy consists of however high the Dow Jones gets. It’s bad for companies because it’ll cut into their profits. The more these entities can convince you that deflation is bad, the more likely people are to campaign against it.

The real truth of it is that deflation is good for PEOPLE. People are not the economy. The concern I have is that during a deflationary period companies tend to do more layoffs and cut corners on quality control. As long as income & unemployment stay the same then deflation would be a very welcome reprieve from these last couple of years.

This is why the union strikes are so important right now. If people see that the current union strikes work, then they’re far more likely to unionize when companies start to do layoffs. Really the only way for companies to protect themselves from deflation is to screw over the workers, and unions stand in direct opposition to that move.

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

DOJ wants people to realize just how large Google is. Google doesn’t want people to realize how big they are.

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Reddit? No. I was thinking moreso Meta. They have the deeper pockets and a proven track record of breaking privacy laws to their own benefit.

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

My tin foil hat is telling me it’s one of the other social media companies funding a hacking group to do it. They stand to have the most to lose, and they’ve seemingly decided to enjoy changing the narrative regarding multiple topics. Lemmy stands directly against what the bigger social medias stand for.

I have no evidence to back this though. As a business owner I just know that things become very consistent when people are being paid, and very inconsistent when they aren’t. These attacks are seemingly very consistent/organized.

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Saying something with the word “fact” at the end makes it true. Fact.

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Damn, you really hate Mexicans don’t you?

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Somewhere between “they all deserve to eat” and “get off my bed” for me.

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

If they wanted to protect kids they’d have a long list of better options.

Gun control Better funding for education Mental health services Improvements to adoption/foster care systems

The list goes on. We’ve been shown the government only cares about kids until they’re born. So until those things are fixed, I’m going to assume it’s not really about the kids, and more about stripping our rights away.

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

Not understanding and not approving of it are two different things. Millennials love our quirky/scary younger siblings, and I won’t hear otherwise.

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I agree with what this is saying, I’m not sure Seth MacFarlane is who the “Rich” is in this story.

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

They’re doing It to mine too.

Cries in American

[-] Kungolicious@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of my first day of a computer programming class. My teacher told us to write down instructions on how to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Then he would follow the instructions.

“Put the peanut butter inside two slices of bread.” He’d grab the jar of peanut butter and put the whole jar inside two slices of bread

“Grab a knife and scoop out the peanut butter.” He’d start stabbing the lid.

Beautiful analogy of what it’s like to deal with technology

view more: next ›

Kungolicious

joined 1 year ago